San Jose and the Value of Social Justice

I have always found “social justice” to be, politely put, a bizarre concept. A theory that would require me to pay reparations to blacks just because I was born “white” simply cannot stand the test of reason. Never mind that I am a first generation American whose family comes from Germany and Spain or that no black person alive today has been victimized by institutionalized, government sanctioned slavery (aside from the government sugar daddy welfare types that is but that is another story for another time) in living memory.

One of the more curiouser and curiouser (to quote Alice) concepts to ooze out of the “social justice” quagmire is the so called sanctuary city. The “social justice” warriors claim the compassionate moral high ground by granting special status and protections to people who have already broken the law and often openly admit their racial preferences and refusal to assimilate into American culture. As an aside, why is someone deserving of the title “warrior” when they are almost always immune to the consequences of their actions?

Some time ago, exactly how long escapes me, the wise and benevolent city fathers of San Jose, California refused to apply the law to a Stanford swimmer for raping an incapacitated woman. The social justice crowd that day reasoned the rape victims rights were far less important than skippys career. This seemed odd to me. As a life long observer of the delusional left I waited in vain for the feminists to either crucify skippy the rapist or the “leaders” who gave him what was essentially a pass. Instead, crickets. After the Clinton years I suppose rape is only a crime when a conservative or republican is the perpetrator or Lena Dunham is the victim. Although I suppose having sex with her would be punishment enough.

Fast forward to just recently. Setting, again the liberal socialist workers paradise of San Jose. This time instead of rape it is an ongoing case of seemingly severe spousal abuse. The perp, an immigrant from India who obviously never heard of a fellow named Ghandi. The victim, the thug’s wife. Apparently, having been much and frequently abused by this “tolerant”, “peace loving” immigrant who only wanted to “better his life” she recorded one of his abuse sessions on her cell phone. Then she had the unmitigated gall to turn the thug into the police.

You dear reader could be forgiven for thinking you knew the outcome of this tragic situation, ie the law exercises its duty to protect and defend. The lowlife wife beater spends five years in prison (perhaps serving as a wife himself) then gets sent back to India to study the writings of that Ghandi guy. As I always told the students in my basic tax preparation class, “Be careful applying reason where it is not warranted.” As in the swimmer case before, reason was abandoned for the power of the dark side.

Assistant District Attorney Steve Fein was assigned to prosecute the case. What he did instead was allow the wife beater to plead to an “accessory after the fact” charge. This is the highest charge that could be leveled without running the risk of wife beater being deported. DA Fein told the press that his boss Santa Clara District Attorney Jeff Rosen, tries to avoid such deportations. Really?

I can’t help but wonder, what’s the magic here? Do these “social justice warriors” like wife beaters? Or do they only like immigrant wife beaters? How can these two alleged men, Fein and Rosen be considered anything but the embodiment evil after such callous behavior? What other possible explanation for their actions can there be? Anyone who votes for them now is, like the wife beater, an accessory after the fact in every crime committed by the thugs these two mollycoddle.

This is a clear case of the “value” of “social justice” or how to make yourself feel better at the expense of others. Living in their doubtlessly gated communities “social justice warriors” like Fein, Rosen and their ilk will never have to come face to face with the thugs they allow to run amok in the communities they are sworn to protect and defend. In the social justice world an immigrant wife beater is far to important to “sacrifice” over some clearly racist and intolerant women. Perhaps even more sad is the fact that many of the future victims of these same thugs buy into the social justice nonsense spouted by Fein and Rosen types. Bizarre indeed.

As I finish up here I can not give the media a pass on this one. It seems their only concern was how dare the “rich” and “successful” victim record her beating! Surely she was guilty of a crime by recording him beat her without his permission. On the whole they presented the outcome here as justice at its finest. I wonder if any of the heartless media “social justice warriors” will feel even a pang of guilt should, as far to often happens, the wife beater kills his wife and/or kids? I doubt it. These wannabe humans have traded their souls for the ability to signal to the world their “virtue” over the great unwashed. Truly the so called media has much to answer for.

To even the most simple minded observer it is clear that in San Jose your immigration status is far more important than the law. Mexican drug lords and ISIS terrorists must be salivating at the thought of their newfound safe haven. Fein, Rosen and their media accomplices have sent the message loud and clear. In San Jose, if you are an “immigrant”, there are few crimes that will get you deported, unless you get caught voting republican. In that case you are screwed.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

On Conversing With Liberals

With tax season coming to a close I finally get a moment to think about something other than taxes. It’s only one day off, the calm before the storm, in more ways than one, but it allows me a moment to write. For that I am grateful.

In my three jobs I get to know/work with many kinds of people. Even here in the supposed conservative bastion of Utah liberals run free. Sadly, the once great city of Salt Lake may be lost forever. The public education system here has much to answer for.

While working one of my jobs Mr. X, I’ll call him that to respect his privacy, and I were having a brief chat about freedom in general. He routinely claims to love freedom then says things like the NSA is welcome to spy on him all they want. While I doubt Mr. X has much to hide, his caviler attitude towards domestic warrantless spying is troubling to those of us who truly love freedom. In fact he ended his participation in the conversation by stating flatly that if “you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear.” Right, and work sets you free.

During another recent conversation about how moslems were taking over certain places in America (I referred to Dearborn, Michigan specifically) and refusing, in general, to assimilate I was especially surprised by his attitude on two counts. Remember, he considers himself the voice of reason and says he loves freedom.

First, since he hadn’t heard about this from “the news” he didn’t believe it. I was, he intimated, making this stuff up. I told him the facts are readily apparent if one is willing to spend a few minutes on the internet. He “doubted very much” that the moslems in Dearborn were implementing sharia law. Besides, even if they did that was “their business”. I found that statement quite curious given his frequent rantings against religious people for “forcing their religion” down his throat. Mr. X was totally fine with moslems taking over Dearborn, MI but is furious that the “Mormons, right here” in “his” home state deny him “right after right”. As a Mormon who has never denied anyone a constitutionally protected right (and I don’t know any Mormons who would) I asked what rights he was being denied. The only answer he could come up with was how happy he was when the Olympics were in Salt Lake City. He walked around downtown Salt Lake City with a beer in his hands because he could. Oh the inhumanity of being denied open beer carry on public streets! So I guess, based on his own testimony, it is far more important to be able to “piss off” Mormons by open carrying a beer on the streets of Salt Lake City than it is to deny moslems the “right to their culture” even though their culture includes things like honor killings and female genital mutilation.

Secondly, I was surprised at just how fast he played the race card on me. Apparently noticing these things, or maybe pointing these things out in public, makes me a racist. (There would be little point trying to explain that islam is not a race, the race card is to valuable an asset to allow to be sidetracked by something as irrelevant as the truth) Mr. X, having lost this argument once before (when I pointed out and he denied that the Kenyan ever said republicans were welcome to work with him as long as we went to the back of the bus) should have known better. Apparently his cognitive dissonance got the better of him. At this point I felt the massively unjustified need to defend myself. I told Mr. X that his belief in said events was not required for them to be true. As for calling me a racist I pointed out that I work on a daily basis with three black men and that my best friend in the whole world is hispanic. These facts I continued present no problems to me at all but rendered his attack shallow, uninformed and pedantic. I admit I threw the last word in simply because I knew he would have no idea what it meant. A little confusion can be a wonderful thing to watch.

Needless to say, our “friendship” is now reduced to a much more formal working relationship. As sad as that is, that is his choice. I don’t play that kind of game as I have no problem defending my beliefs. I don’t make stuff up or deny reality. Forty year old five year olds do though. In some cases they do routinely.

I guess the point of all this is just to point out that this is how liberals/progressives think or, more properly, refuse to think. They are so focused on their virtue signaling that the truth becomes an impediment to them constructing their self image. There are far to many Mr. X’s out there who live comfortable but majorly deluded lives. They surround themselves with like minded dispensers of “reason”, “justice” and “compassion” resulting in an often impenetrable bubble of self righteous cognitive dissonance. Which, when you think about it, is highly ironic. They suffer from the very condition, often much more severely, than the “religious” people they like to label as self righteous, insensitive and bigoted.

It has been my sad experience of the last forty years that there is virtually no way to breach the walls of self absorbed virtue that encapsulate most people like Mr. X. Until someone drops him into one of the many no go zones in Dearborn and he physically experiences the foulness of islam up close and personal he will never “get it.”

As a supporter of gay marriage I hope Mr. X never has to witness a gay man being thrown from the roof of a ten story building in the name of islam. I fear though that something like that is the only thing that will breach the wall he has surrounded himself with. Yet people like him consider people like me unreasonable. How sad.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Liberals Education And ISIS

Liberals/progressives are by nature an unhappy bunch. They spend their lives “worrying” what other people are doing or thinking. This “worry” goads them into countless hours of contemplation and sometimes, actions concerning just how to assuage their concerns by running other peoples lives. No where is this more evident than in the field of public education.

A great insight to this is Democratic Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s 1993 treatise “Defining Deviancy Down.” In this work he postulates that some behaviors, once considered improper or unacceptable in polite society are now being normalized. He furthers his analysis by adding the fact that many once widely accepted as normal behaviors are subtly being transformed into unconscionable acts of deviancy. Perhaps the subtitle of this valuable work explains his thesis better than I have so far, “How We’ve Become Accustomed To Alarming Levels Of Crime And Destructive Behavior.” An excellent summation of the results of liberal intentions indeed.

The tragic effects of such efforts in society are to numerous to mention in their entirety. Consider the near absolute indifference to biased judges refusing to recuse themselves from cases they should never be presiding over (thus creating out of thin air the constitutional concept of gay marriage), the tolerance/acceptance of so called sanctuary cities (magnets for welfare abuse and crime) or the imposition of the intellectually vacant concept of multiculturalism (the demand that every society/culture is seen to be of equal value).

In their never ending quest to feel better about themselves by dominating others liberals have no qualms about these and numerous other deviant behaviors. The see no problem with Hillary Clinton placing top secret information on a readily hackable server in clear violation of a law that has been enforced on others.

They have no issue with a well documented serial abuser of women, and credibly accused of being a rapist, one William Jefferson Blythe Clinton running for the highest office in the land but go apoplectic when a republican seeking the same office talked about grabbing women by their privates eleven years ago.

A republican senator accused of soliciting gay sex is the epitome of evil (which opens up another panoply of contradictions but that is another article) while Anthony Weiners apparently uncontrollable tendency to send pictures of his “last name” to underage girls qualifies him to run for pubic, I mean public, office.

Perhaps the most tragic result of all is the conversion by liberals of the most heinous criminals into victims of society. The poor rapist must be excused because the prom queen rebuffed his advances twenty years ago. The poor inner city rioter must be excused because my white privilege allows me to work 60-80 hours a week to support my family and his. The sad illegal alien murderer must be forgiven because some hundred years ago Mexico lost a war with America. The white kid with the the outstanding grades must surrender his place at certain ivy league colleges so the minority who can barely read or write will not suffer damage to his precious self esteem. Liberals reading this are shaking their head in amazement that I, an evil conservative, understand so well the less fortunate. Normal people reading this are, and should be, infuriated.

These are appalling representations of liberal/progressive ideology. Yet they are acceptable, or at least tolerable, to a vast number of Americans.

Without a doubt, Americans have been indoctrinated to be dangerously more permissive of ideas and actions that would have been intolerable even in my parents generation. This indoctrination occurs at many levels but the most corrosive is in the public education system. Liberals/progressives have spent the last sixty years using the public education system to train Americans to feel guilty for accepting traditional time tested and reality approved moral, or for that matter any, standards.

In some ways the liberal/progressive version of public education has a lot in common with the ISIS version of public education. Both seek to divide children from their parents, physically, spiritually and intellectually, using indoctrination and propaganda (common core, new civics anyone?). Both seek to destroy moral and just ideas. Both seek to dominate. Neither tolerates any criticism no matter how valid. The NEA and ISIS seek to create a society unable to critically think for itself. Like ISIS, liberals need illiterate, easily lead, intellectual zombies.

Like American liberals, ISIS gets its child victims early. As young as four years old according to the latest release of the “Cubs of the Caliphate” video series. This sickening edition appeared on ISIS social media channels recently. It shows footage of a 4 year old little boy being handed a gun and executing a chained up prisoner. All during the murder, he shot the man five times, the child is shouting, “Allahu akbar!”

Another child, approximately ten years old, uses a knife to behead a captive.

In the sick video’s final scene another child killer slashes a prisoners throat then leaves the knife planted in his victim’s back.

Doubtlessly these children will end up as suicide bombers somewhere.

This is the same mindset that nourishes black rioters shouting black lives matter as they steal everything they can get their hands on. This is the same mindset that allows someone to assassinate police officers without remorse. This is the same suppression of humanity demanded by liberals that allows blacks to enjoy brutally assaulting and torturing a white handicapped person. Truly, liberal/progressives have a lot to answer for.

Stripped of their flowery phrases, ivy league degrees and faux concern over “the children”, the distance between ISIS and NEA approved educational philosophies can be measured in millimeters. The predictable results of those philosophies are closing towards each other with sickening swiftness.

Anyone who says there is no comparison between ISIS approved education and the liberal version of today’s American public education system can be quickly rebuked with two words.

Chicago, Illinois.

Leave a comment

Filed under Culture

Fecal Matter Ingestion Syndrome

The militant homersexuals have, with the help of a compliant national media and completely infiltrated educational system, dominated the so called “gay rights” movement for the last ten years at least. I have often said they were deranged at best and purely evil (advocates for pedophilia as an example) at worst. They have gone from the pitiable we were “born this way” to “just leave us alone” to we “just want to be treated fairly” to the current militant demand that everyone must endorse and celebrate their lifestyle under penalty of law.

I have believed from day one that such a lifestyle and it’s incumbent denial of vast swaths of reality, had to be physically and emotionally damaging to its practitioners. I do not take this concept frivolously. In my fifty some years I have known a dozen open, practicing homersexuals. Without exception they all share one predominant characteristic. They were universally unhappy. Some of these poor souls I worked with on a daily basis, one for three years and one for over ten years. I do not believe that any of their unhappiness was related to not being able to visit their “spouse” in the hospital or inheriting their “spouses” estates tax free.

While they would not admit it, after listening to their sad ruminatings it became painfully obvious that what they were seeking could not be found in the lifestyle they claimed to enjoy so much. They wanted a stable, committed relationship with a loving partner. How they expect to create this while simultaneously demanding to have over 100 sexual partners a year and a vastly higher rates of STD’s (CDC numbers not mine) escapes them. I suppose they feel that by being gay, the rules concerning loyalty, fidelity and self sacrifice don’t apply.

I do not find this surprising given the amount of indoctrination they have been subjected to by the likes of Dan Savage (what a great name for a professional, government sponsored bully), the Kenyan little Barry, professional hate mongers like Gavin Newsome and hollywood apologists like Elton John. In fact numerous political super pacs (HRC for starters) have for years been actively vilifying anyone that does not consume as much fecal matter as they do.

In their defense, it must really be love. According to the CDC the average homersexual consumes four pounds of fecal matter each year. As much as I love my wife of 31 years I simply will not go there.

As I was contemplating why the keepers of tolerance and understanding were so often violently neither, the concept of Fecal Matter Ingestion Syndrome occurred to me. Then I came across the story of the pair of homersexuals that accosted Ivanka Trump, her husband and her young children on a recent flight. These two losers were able to confirm my suspicions that FMIS was an actual condition. Since “gay” people are supposedly the very definition of tolerance and understanding, something else must have triggered their outburst. Hence, Fecal Matter Ingestion Syndrome. Honestly, normal people don’t act this way.

The first FMIS victim, and legend in his own mind, a lawyer named Goldstein, began harassing Ivanka and her family while they were on the plane. Swinging his “son” around during an emotional outburst directed at Ivanka he demanded to know why she and her family were allowed on the plane. I guess he felt that only tolerant, understanding liberals like himself are entitled to fly commercially. A short investigation by myself revealed that this self absorbed consumer of excrement apparently has only one skill, sexual harassment lawsuits. I suspect he should be named gold digger rather than a time honored name like Goldstien.

Gold diggers “husband/wife” kept himself busy documenting his “wife’s/husbands” assault on Ivanka and her children via his twitter feed. Both cowards quickly deleted their twitter accounts when their self serving fantasy version of events was overtaken by reality. Neither of the panty wearing, child harassing, “brave” beyond belief social injustice warriors have been willing to talk to the overly supportive and largely disinterested press. Hmnnn…kinda makes me wonder. Does the media know something they’re not telling us? Is there a FMIS cover up going on here?

Demonstrating more class than either of the FMIS victims could ever contemplate, both Ivanka and her husband (a real husband not some imaginary construct designed to improve your sad self image), Jared Kushner refrained from participating in the homersexuals pathetic display. Both parents displayed reserve and tolerance far beyond what the two homersexuals were capable of practicing and frankly, more than they deserved. Honestly, anyone attacking my wife or kids is going to see the worst side of me in a hurry. It’s okay, I don’t need a lawyer, I’ll pay the fine.

I believe Fecal Matter Ingestion Syndrome is real and these two homersexuals are living proof. I don’t think the medical community, given their now often open endorsement of the homersexual lifestyle, and by default its many detrimental health risks, will consider my FMIS theory worthy of further study though. As an example consider the case of Dr. Paul Church and Boston’s Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Even CDC facts proving his case did not help him.

Honestly, normal people do not regularly ingest fecal matter and the fact that a segment of the population chooses to do so, and considers that normal, is mind boggling to me. Still, I think the effects of consuming fecal matter on a regular basis are widespread and clearly evident in the homersexual community today. With competent study perhaps a way could be found to alleviate the burdens of sadness, hate, belligerence, self absorption and grievance carrying that afflicts so many homersexuals today. Otherwise they will continue their short, unhappy lives at the expense of themselves as well as innocent victims like Ivanka’s kids. Or yours.

1 Comment

Filed under The Gay Agenda

Islam And Some Non-PC Facts

I have never tried to hide my disdain of islam. Having studied it for the last several years I can find literally no good in it. It is a vile political system of subjugation that not only tolerates evil but demands its followers perpetuate evil in hope of salvation. I am sick of hearing how islam has been “hijacked” by extremists. As Col. Potter would say, “Pigeon pellets!” All one has to do is read the quran and the hadith to understand that the supposed hijackers of the religion of peace are actually the devout moslems allah seeks. I know because I have read the books. Have you?

Don’t take my word for it, read the books. Just be aware that the moslem group CAIR has released a sanitized, cleaner and much happier version of the quran. This is simply propaganda. I suggest you read the actual quran. A word of caution. In the beginning you will find much that seems to be common with Christianity. In fact, Christianity and islam have nothing in common. Later in the quran, if your not a hollywood liberal, rap loving creep or murderous Chicago drug dealer you will be shocked and disturbed at the pure evil espoused by this so called scripture.

Many want to try and hide the face of islam by ascribing a great history of science, art and innovation to the so called religion of peace. Really? Name the current literary moslem masterpiece. You can’t because moslems only read two books, the quran and the hadith. Name the last Oscar winning moslem film. What is the latest moslem innovation in healthcare (I don’t mean AK 47 painkillers). When was the last moslem designer trend (burkinis are not a fashion trend, they are a symbol of subjugation) featured in a Paris fashion house? Are there any gay moslem interior designers left that haven’t been thrown to their deaths off the rooftops of Gaza, Pakistan etc?

Yes, islam has a history. It is a violent, dark and bloody history. Just since 9/11 moslems have launched 29,955 terror attacks world wide. Still, that history runs much longer than just since 9/11. Allow me to partially refresh your memory.

The Shoe bomber was a moslem.

The Beltway snipers were moslems.

The HaSharon mall killer was a moslem.

The Nice, France killer was a moslem.

The Fort Hood shooter was a moslem.

The TWA flight 847 hijackers/killers were moslems.

The underwear bomber was a moslem.

The U-S.S. Cole bombers were moslems.

The Khobar Towers bombers were moslems.

The Orlando nightclub killer was a moslem.

The Madrid train bombers were moslems.

The Charlie Hebdo killers were moslems.

The Bali nightclub bombers were moslems.

The killers of Lee Rigby were moslems.

The London subway bombers were moslems.

The Luxor, Egypt killers were moslems.

The Moscow theater attackers were moslems.

The Boston Marathon bombers were moslems.

The Pan-Am flight #93 bombers were moslems.

The Air France Entebbe hijackers were moslems.

The Brussels, Belgium airport killers were moslems.

The Iranian Embassy takeover, was by moslems.

The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were moslems.

The Libyan U.S. Embassy attack was by moslems.

The Little Rock, Ark recruiting office killer was a moslem.

The Buenos Aires suicide bombers were moslems.

The Israeli Olympic team attackers were moslems.

The Kenyan U.S. Embassy bombers were moslems.

The Paris, France music hall killers were moslems.

The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were moslems.

The Beslan Russian school attackers were moslems.

The first World Trade Center bombers were moslems.

The Peshawar, Pakistan school killers were moslems.

The Bombay & Mumbai India attackers were moslems.

The Achille Lauro cruise ship hijackers were moslems.

The September 11th 2001 airline hijackers were moslems.

The Chattanooga recruiting center shooting was a moslem.

I know diversity and tolerance are the liberal watchwords of today. How do these concepts apply in the non moslem world? Let’s think about the following for a minute.

Buddhists don’t seem to have a problem living with Hindus.

Hindus don’t seem to have a problem living with Christians.

Hindus don’t seem to have a problem living with Jews.

Christians don’t seem to have a problem living with Shintos.

Shintos don’t seem to have a problem living with Confucians.

Confucians don’t seem to have a problem living with Baha’i’s.

Baha’i’s don’t seem to have a problem living with Jews.

Jews don’t seem to have a problem living with Atheists.

Atheists don’t seem to have a problem living with Buddhists.

Buddhists don’t seem to have a problem living with Sikhs.

Sikhs don’t seem to have a problem living with Hindus.

Hindus don’t seem to have a problem living with Baha’i’s.

Baha’i’s don’t seem to have a problem living with Christians.

Christians don’t seem to have a problem living with Jews.

Jews don’t seem to have a problem living with Buddhists.

Buddhists don’t seem to have a problem living with Shintos.

Shintos don’t seem to have a problem living with Atheists.

Atheists don’t seem to have a problem living with Confucians.

Confucians don’t seem to have a problem living with Hindus.

Isn’t that interesting? Seems like nearly everyone except the moslems have got this tolerance and diversity thing down. Not that all these comparisons suggest perfect peace and harmony but when is the last time you heard about a Christian suicide bomber, a Hindu airline hijacker or Shinto sniper?

It is a demonstrable fact that moslems have a problem living with Hindus, Buddhists, Christians, Jews, Sikhs, Baha’i’s, Shintos and Atheists. Moslems have a huge problem living with other moslems.

So, where are some of the places moslems are unhappy?

They don’t seem to be happy in Afghanistan, Egypt, Gaza, Iran, Iraq, Kenya, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Nigeria, Pakistan, Sudan, Syria or Yemen.

As Mr. Spock would say, “Fascinating.” Moslems are not happy anywhere they are in charge. Who do they blame for this problem? Not their islamic ideology that demands of them to hate, rape, torture, enslave and kill in the name of their god. Not their hate spewing, wealth grabbing, intolerant and hypocritical leadership. Not themselves for willingly joining in and perpetuating the hate in the hopes of gaining the services of 72 virgins. They blame the countries they claim to be happy in.

None of this should be surprising considering they are simply following the edicts of their perfect man, Mohammed. Don’t know much about him? Here is a short primer. He was a polygamist warlord who launched some thirty military campaigns, leading many of them himself. After his victories he allowed, even encouraged, his armies to rape, murder, pillage and enslave to their hearts desire. He was a thief who raided caravans. He was a slave owner and trader. He ordered over a dozen massacres, employed torture at every opportunity and killed anyone who dared to disagree with him. From this comes the religion of peace?

So, where are moslems happy?

Seems they’re mostly happy in Australia. Except when they are rioting or raping.

Seems they’re mostly happy in Belgium. Except when they are rioting or raping.

Seems they’re mostly happy in Canada. Except when they are rioting or raping.

Seems they’re mostly happy in England. Except when they are rioting, raping or killing.

Seems they’re mostly happy in France. Except when they are rioting and killing.

Seems they’re mostly happy in Germany. Except when they are rioting or raping.

Seems they’re mostly happy in India. Except when they are rioting or raping.

Seems they’re mostly happy in Italy. Except when they are rioting or raping.

Seems they’re mostly happy in Norway. Except when they are rioting or raping.

Seems they’re mostly happy in Sweden. Except when they are rioting/raping in mass.

Seems they’re mostly happy in the USA. Except when protesting nearly everything.

Is it just me or is this religion way to comfortable with rape? Where is a feminist when you need one? Gloria Steinham, Whoopie, Lena Dunham et al, where are you?

Still, isn’t it interesting that moslems claim they are happy in almost every country that is not islamic. How do they respond to this sudden influx of happiness? After they attach themselves to the welfare teat of their host, they begin to try and force changes in their country of choice to make it resemble the islamic country they came from. So, I can’t help but wonder, if it was so bad there, why change where you are now to be an exact copy of where you left? Hint, it is the islamic principle of birth rate invasion.

So, how do moslems attempt to affect the required changes. Outside of political correctness, they do it with two kinds of organizations, military and civil, and two kinds of actions, out breeding the local population and engaging in legal and not so legal harassment and intimidation.

The military wings of islam are, but not limited to:

Abdullah Azzam Brigades: A militant offshoot of al Qaeda.

Abu Sayyaf: A small and violent islamic jihadist group/terror organization.

Al-Badr: An islamic militant group/terror organization.

Al-Nusra: Front for the Conquest of the Levant. An islamic terror organization.

Ansaru: An islamic terror organization.

Al-Qaeda: An islamic terror organization.

Boko Haram: An islamic terror organization.

Islamic Jihad: An islamic terror organization.

ISIS: An islamic terror organization.

Jemaah Islamiyah: An islamic terror organization.

Hamas: An islamic resistance movement/terror organization.

Hezbollah: The party of allah, an islamic terror organization.

Lashkar-e-Taiba: An islamic terror organization

Muslim Brotherhood: An islamic terror organization.

Palestine Liberation Front: An islamic terror organization.

Taliban: An islamic terror organization disguised as a government.

The Palistinian Authority. An islamic terror organization disguised as a government.

The civilian wings of islam are, but not limited to:

CAIR, U.S Council of moslem Organizations, The moslem Student Association, United moslem Relief, Islamic Circle of North America, The moslem Sisterhood, The Alianza islamica, The moslem Lawyers Association, The moslem American Society, The North American islamic Trust, The Association of moslem Social Scientists, The Association of moslem Scientists and Engineers, The islamic Medical Association, Moslem Youth of North America and the Moslem Businessmen Association to name a few.

For every one of these national groups there are one or more state or city equivalents throughout the nation. Here is just a sample.

The moslem Bar Association of Chicago, The islamic Society of Dayton and the moslems in New York City Project.

So now a thoughtful person must now wonder, is it possible for a devout moslem be good Americans? The short answer is no. Here is a partial explanation of why.

Theologically. No, because his allegiance is first and foremost to allah, The moon

god of Arabia.

Religiously. No, because no other religion is tolerated or accepted by allah except

islam. (quran, 2:256)(koran)

Scripturally. No, because a moslems allegiance is to the five pillars of islam and the

quran over all else.

Geographically. No, because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he must turn

towards and pray to five times a day.

Socially. No, because the quran forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.

He is in fact required to either kill Christians and Jews wherever he may find them or

enslave them.

Politically. No, because he must submit to the imams and mullahs (spiritual leaders),

who teach annihilation of Israel and in particular, the destruction of America, the

great Satan.”

Domestically. No, because he is instructed to marry four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him. (quran 4:34 )

Intellectually. No, because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is

based on biblical principles. Islamic teachings insist the bible is a corrupted book.

Philosophically. No, because islam, mohammad, and the quran do not allow for the

freedom of religion or expression. Islam demands that democracy and islam cannot

co-exist. Every moslem government is either a theocracy, dictatorial or autocratic.

Spiritually. No, because the Christian’s God is loving and kind, while allah is not

once referred to as Heavenly Father, nor is he even called love in the quran’s 99

excellent names.

Because of what we have learned so far, and after much study and careful deliberation, perhaps we should be very suspicious of any moslems in America. It is readily apparent the devout moslem cannot be both a ‘good’ moslem and a ‘good’ American. Your acceptance of that last statement is not required for it to be true. The moslems have openly and repeatedly said they will destroy us from within. For the devout moslem this is a religious duty/war. Again, your acceptance of that last statement is not required for it to be the truth.

In many European countries (England, France, Sweden to name a few in the news lately) there are already dozens, if not hundreds of designated moslem no go zones. In these pits of darkness hell, in the form a sharia law, reigns. Local police and prosecutors will not intervene, arrest or prosecute anyone violating their countries laws in these deadly no go zones. Let’s take a moment and learn about peaceful sharia.

An introduction to sharia law:

Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand.

Criticizing or denying any part of the quran is punishable by death.

Criticizing or denying that mohammad is a prophet is punishable by death.

Criticizing or denying allah, the moon god of islam, is punishable by death.

A moslem who becomes a non-moslem is punished by death.

A non-moslem who leads a moslem away from Islam is punished by death.

A non-moslem man who marries a moslem woman is punished by death.

A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.

Girls’ clitoris should be cut (per mohammad’s words in Book 41, kitab al-adab, hadith 5251).

A woman can have 1 husband, but a man can have up to 4 wives; mohammad can have more.

A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband’s consent to divorce.

A man can beat his wife for insubordination.

Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.

A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).

A woman’s testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man’s.

A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.

A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).

A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.

Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to allah – i.e., be halal.

Moslems should engage in Taqiyya (the islamic principle that allows one to lie, cheat, steal and even deny ones islamic faith in the advancement of islam) towards non-moslems.

The above list is no where near complete. Examples, a women needs a mans permission to receive an education, to work outside the home and needs a male escort anytime she leaves the home. Don’t even get me started on so called “honor” killings. Study sharia law and prepare to be sickened.

It is difficult to understand why supposedly intelligent people would flock to such a religion. What is even harder to understand is why we would import hundreds of thousands of these ideological primitives every year. Rational, sane people should not stand for this.

The short version is simply that if you are a brutal sixth century thug with more teeth than brain cells who enjoys raping (both women and little boys), pillaging, terrorizing, enslaving, murdering and being totally unaccountable for such actions, islam is for you.

God help us all.

1 Comment

Filed under Islam

Serious As A Heart Attack

One of my best friends growing up had a favorite saying he would deploy every time he wanted to be taken seriously. He would say he was, “serious as a heart attack.” I never attached much worth to the statement as I’m pretty sure I knew when he was being serious and when he wasn’t. Besides, what does a kid know about heart attacks? Still the phrase, and the earnestness that often accompanied it has stuck with me all these years.

My white privilege must deserted me as, a little over a week ago, I had a heart attack. Like many bad things that happen, it came out of the blue, kind of. What I mean by that is that my numbers (cholesterol, triglycerides etc) were all well within normal. My weight was a little high as was my blood pressure. I exercise regularly and have, over the last two years made major health modifications to my diet. I was making good but slow and steady progress towards my weight loss and BP issues. In fact I had just finished my workout at the gym and was getting ready to shower when I had my heart attack.

It came on fairly quickly and thanks to thirty years of first aid and CPR classes it didn’t take me long to realize what was happening. I am truly thankful to the stranger who called 911 when I asked for help. I do not remember everything that happened rather I have a stream of fleeting images, impressions and recollections. The pain though, was totally unforgettable.

I remember, and greatly appreciate, the gym employee who rushed into the locker room where I was laying nearly passed out on a bench and took control. He sent someone to wait for the ambulance, sent others to get more benches to get me onto a stable platform and sent another person to get towels to cover me, partly because I was naked I’m sure but I was going into shock and covering the victim is part of first aid. As I began shaking violently he put his hand on my shoulder and kept telling me the EMT’s were on the way and he would take care of me. As odd as it may seem my mind had divided itself into two parts by this point. The first part was focusing simply on the desperately difficult act of breathing. The second part was actually quite calm and rational. I could hear everything going on around me. I understood what people were saying and, I hate to say it, was even critiquing the first aid skills of those helping me. The one thing I found odd about the entire experience was the fact that no matter how hard I tried, I could not open my eyes. Still, when I can get back to the gym I want to thank him. In the depths of my pain and confusion his calm and commanding presence was an anchor for me to hang onto. I can never thank him enough.

When the EMT’s arrived I remember them asking me questions and I did my best to answer but talking was extremely difficult. I don’t remember transitioning to the ambulance but I do remember hearing the siren and deducing that I was in an ambulance. I remember hearing one of the EMT’s talking to the hospital over the radio although I don’t remember what he said. The next thing I remember was a doctor, at least I thought he was a doctor, telling me about the cathitor and how he was going to run it up my arm and into my heart. They did so and the nurse who talked to me later told me that once they removed the 100% blockage, I passed out. A stint was placed and I was sent to ICU. Three days later I went home.

The good news is I am expected to fully recover. The bad news is that it is unlikely I will be able to continue to work the three jobs I have worked for so long. I can now only work enough to support my family. My NYC welfare queen and illegal alien family will now have to seek other means of support. I am not really sorry about that but this time, I am serious as a heart attack.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Seattle, A Perfect Liberal Example

Anyone paying attention throughout the 2016 presidential campaign could not have failed to notice the differences between liberals/progressives vs conservatives. I am not going to elaborate on the self evident virtues of conservatism here. I want to continue the examination of liberal/progressive thought as displayed by some of its current supporters. Let me begin by simply asking a few questions.

Chicago, according to the Kenyan and his minions, is the “blue print” for national “common sense” gun control. As of a couple of days ago some 4000 people had been shot there just this year. Is this the kind of success he is, pardon the pun, shooting for?

 
The well paid “protesters” (up to $350 a day according to a recent Craigslist ad) tearing up so many communities to whine about the election results continue their destructive behavior un-commented on by the Kenyan. His lack of presence here is being taken as tacit endorsement by the paid thugs rampaging on our streets. The Kenyan knows this therefore his silence is in fact a tacit endorsement. Why do he and his minions remain silent? Does he really enjoy watching his army of paid liberal thugs destroying the very communities that more often than not elected him?

 
Remember the IRS targeting scandal? Remember that the IRS commissioner at the time visited the White House (coordinating no doubt) how many hundreds of times? It wasn’t all just about defunding conservative opposition to the Kenyan. It began with the non-profit called True The Vote. Why, when the allegations turned into facts, did the Kenyan and his minions do nothing substantial to rectify this?

 
Why did the Kenyan go on foreign television and tell illegal aliens in America that it was okay for them to vote in the presidential election, that there would be no legal consequences. A follow up, why did no liberal come out against this clear endorsement of the violation of U.S. Law? A follow up, why is anyone pointing this out a racist?

 
The scandal that will not die provides perhaps the clearest example liberal hypocrisy of all. I am only going to limit myself to Clinton’s maid. Every time she printed out a classified document she and Clinton were committing felonies. They committed felonies by the hundreds in this example alone. This begs two questions. First, how do we know the maid did not deliver the contents of these documents to any bad actors? A quick cell phone picture/text is all it would take given that she was unsupervised. Second, why are these two, the maid and Clinton, not in prison like others who have done considerably less along the same lines?

 
Finally, a generic question. If the Kenyan’s ideas are so good why does he have to do everything by executive order? It seems to me he had complete control of congress when he first got elected. Why would the democrats at the time not support his agenda then?

 
A friend of mine often says America needs an enema. I have often thought that if that were the case San Francisco would be the logical insertion point. I am now reconsidering that appraisal. Not because San Francisco has moved in any way towards decency or normalcy. No, I am reconsidering because a city I once enjoyed (my family spent ten days there this summer) has fallen so far into the liberal quagmire.

 
Let’s examine a city I have been to several times over the last ten years. A once great city full of hope, promise and opportunity now totters on the edge of insanity. A city I once nearly moved to, Seattle.

 
In a touching display of liberal tolerance, Kshama Sawant, a proudly self-proclaimed Socialist member of the Seattle City Council has called for protesters to shut down Donald Trump’s presidential inauguration. Standing at Seattle City Hall Sawant said, “And let’s make sure on Inauguration Day … let’s do a nationwide shutdown.” Sawant has been nicknamed by locals as “Old Yeller” for her tendency to shout down anyone who disagrees with her. An examination of her record shows her favorite pastime is playing the female/racist/victim card. Anyone wanting to hear her speak should be warned, she is described by many in the community as a hateful, foul mouthed and frequently vindictive representative of Seattle’s version of tolerance, compassion and understanding.

 
Recently a Turkish immigrant shot five people in a local mall. Not surprisingly it was later learned he voted three times in Washington state, even though he is not a citizen. I’m pretty sure no one in Seattle’s version of the election’s commission cared as long as this killer and people like him, vote democrat.

 
During Mayor Ed Murray’s tenure, Seattle, like every other sanctuary city, is becoming a scary place to live and raise children. Socialist council members seek to limit your rights, control ever more of your behavior and take your money to enrich themselves and punish those who disagree with them. Increasing numbers of homeless are sleeping in parks, children’s playgrounds and on sidewalks, accosting passers by for money to buy drugs, alcohol and cigarettes. Graffiti is taking over once clean public places, meaning gangs are feeling the safety and tolerance of city government. Even such demonstrably stupid concepts as heroin “safe houses” are springing up throughout the city. Large parts of Seattle are no longer safe to stroll around by yourself. Even the famous Pike Street Market is dangerous after dark now. It never used to be. I know because I have walked through it many times.

 
Speaking of his highness. Concerning the new coming enforcement of current immigration law the Mayor of Seattle’s illegal alien population boasted, “Seattle has always been a welcoming city.” He added, “The last thing I want is for us to start turning on our neighbors.” I guess being a welcome magnet for every rapist, carjacker, mugger and murderer desperately trying to avoid capture appeals to him. And don’t even think about turning those criminals in if they are here illegally, his highness will not tolerate that level of racist hate.

 
Seattle, a once vibrant and successful city, is adopting liberal lunacy in an all out effort to demonstrate just how diverse and culturally sensitive they are. How much longer will it be:

Before the city council requires women to demonstrate their tolerance of islam by allowing themselves to be raped? Weekly? Monthly? On islamic holidays can they be raped by the same male twice? What does Kshama Sawant think?

Before their compassion for the homeless requires each person to give a set amount to every homeless person they come across? Will the amount be a percentage of your income? Will the amount be higher for “privileged” white males? Do the homeless get to verify the amount you gave is correct? Are moslems exempt from the requirement?

Before graffiti is required to be considered art and not allowed to be removed? Will graffiti “artists” be allowed to “art” up the inside of your premises next? Will you be required to provide a safe, non hostile working environment? Will it be your responsibility to provide the paint? How much will the city council fine you for removing said art?

Before urinating on the sidewalk (as in New York City) is considered normal? Do transgenders get to choose where on the sidewalk they want to make their deposit or will the city thoughtfully provide designated safe spaces for them? Will the city council pass an ordinance requiring passers by to voice their approval of the act upon pain of fine or imprisonment?

Before citizens are not allowed to vote because it would be considered a micro aggression against all the illegals who are voting? Do white people get special ballots with only socialist/communist/liberal candidates? Perhaps to soothe the concerns of illegal voters they will be allowed to vote as early and often (the Chicago way) as they wish.

Before they have police start enforcing politically correct speech codes? Again, per New York city. If you fail to address a person with a sexual mental illness by the correct pronoun, currently there are 52 that I know of, will your fine be $250,000 or just a short stay at a re-educational facility near you?

Before they start fining people for throwing away the wrong kind of garbage, oh wait, this they already are doing.

With lunatics like Ed Murray, Kshama Sawant in charge and those who support and elect them, my guess is these progressive displays of diversity and compassion are not long in coming.

 

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized