Obama Just Proved He is A Radical Muslim

I am often criticized for my quite vocal belief that the Kenyan impersonating our president is a closet muslim. If I have said it once I have said it a million times, the Kenyan is a muslim deep in the practice of Taqiyya (the great deception allowed by the koran).

The so-called nuclear deal with Iran he “negotiated” serves to render all those criticisms invalid. Lets be perfectly blunt, there was no negotiation here. The Iranians got everything they demanded, when the Kenyan could give it to them with the least political damage to himself. He must , as his muslim handlers know, survive the political process to continue the destruction of the greatest nation the world has ever known. America it seems, couldn’t even get four hostages back in return for complete surrender.

Consider a couple of the “terms” of the agreement.

The fact that sanctions are being lifted means Iran will earn millions, perhaps billions, of dollars to begin to restore its failing economy and continue its sponsorship of terrorism around the world with renewed vigor. Iran and even the Kenyans administration have already admitted this.

The so-called inspections are weakened to the point of uselessness. The Iranians will get as much as 24 days advance notice of any “inspection” giving them more than enough time to be certain the inspectors only see what the government wants them to see. Parameters of the deal go as far as barring inspectors from the United States from participating in IAEA inspections. In other words we will often have to accept the word of those who wish us ill that Iran isn’t violating the agreement. Lovely.

As awful as these terms are there is one single fact that clinches beyond a doubt my contention that the Kenyan is a muslim. That fact is that the United States has obligated itself not only to help build the terror states nuclear program but to help Iran protect its nuclear research from attack.

Think about that for a minute. Why would a freedom loving country like America agree to fund the largest state sponsor (Iran) of terrorism in the world? Why would a peaceful country like the United States help build and protect a nuclear bomb building complex for a country that has sworn to kill anyone, including us and our allies, who will not submit to their control? Why would a president turn over the security (the inspection process) of his country to un-elected, anti-American bureaucrats that more often than not, openly express their hate for his country? Can you say fundamental transformation?

In perfect harmony with the first tenet of islam, spread islam everywhere by any means, the Kenyan has done nothing less than make America an Iranian client state. He has given the enemy the knife and soon its cold, sharp edge will be pressed at the throat of America. It is only a matter of time until a mushroom cloud over Washing DC provides the decapitation of the “Great Satan” so loudly and frequently demanded by the cult of islam.

In the middle of one of his multi million dollar, taxpayer funded vacations, the Kenyan knows he has much work to left do. Seeing that virtually no one is now willing to stand in his way, the Kenyan smiles.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Donald, Immigration Reform and Hate Crimes

As a first generation American I have always followed immigration closely. My grandmother and mother came to America through the front door. They worked long and hard to gain their legal status and citizenship. This is as it should be. I do not take their efforts lightly.

The Donald, no stranger to controversy, has made some telling comments on illegal immigration recently. It is not surprising to hear all the usual liberal/progressive/ democratic drones whining about how evil the Donald now is. If you actually think about what he said and familiarize yourself with even the basic facts about illegal immigration, you cannot actually find fault in his comments. One wonders if Donald has decided to unwrap himself from all the touchy feely BS that passes for reason in liberal circles.

In the past it seems he has given some consideration to some form of immigration reform. While he has never called for outright amnesty, at least that I can find, he has sounded at little to soft for me when he repeated the democratic talking points about “jobs Americans will not do” and having to deal with the ones already here. If he has “evolved” in his immigration thinking don’t liberals tell us evolution is a good thing?

The recent killing in San Francisco and the discovery that the Kenyans lack of enforcement released the future killers of 128 Americans rather than deport them proves that Mexico is not sending us their best and brightest. The Kenyan, his henchman Holder and any lawyer that ever helped keep any of these scumbags in America all have blood on their hands and belong in prison. It is entirely appropriate that, since democrats/liberals/progressives will not, Donald remind us what the true cost of illegal immigration can be. The evil in that last sentence is that liberals/democrats/progressives know that Donald is, if anything, understating the problem. For them, it is imperative that the American public be kept in the dark. If for no other reason than liberals need the votes.

And yes, Mexico is sending people here. Racist groups like La Raza (The Race, and why does this title not offend liberals/progressives/democrats?) and the Mexican government instituted an “unofficial” policy years ago to reclaim much of America with an unstoppable wave of illegal immigration, anchor babies and natural population growth. It’s known in inner circles as Reconquest. There are reliable reports that La Raza and the Mexican government both print and distribute “guides” on where to cross the border, how to locate and surrender to ICE as well as the names and numbers of accomplice lawyers and support groups. Included in the guides, some even in the form of comic books for children and those who cannot read, are directions to sanctuary cities, how to get false id’s and apply for government aid programs.

Leaving nothing to chance, once here assimilation is profoundly discouraged. Illegal immigrants are encouraged to devoutly maintain their “native” culture. Simple minded liberals/progressives/democrats echo this with their demands for multiculturalism. The cost burdens of non-assimilation alone show the lunacy of such demands but lunacy is what drives liberals/progressives/democrats. In their sad attempt to show how much more they “care” about anything they will cheerfully spend us into oblivion.

For calling out the failure of liberal/progressive/democratic immigration policy Donald is now paying a price. Politically correct companies like Macy’s and NBC have unceremoniously dumped the Donald. Univision, the propaganda arm of the Mexican government, has severed relations with him as well. If reports about the contracts between Donald and Univision are correct it will likely cost them millions of dollars when Donald wins in court. Univision doesn’t care. As a propaganda agency their mission is dis-information. The Mexican government will make up the cash shortfall. As for Macy’s they have long been an anti-American company. Why anyone would shop there escapes me entirely. As for NBC I wasn’t aware they were even still on the air.

For daring to address the subject of illegal immigration the Donald is now the single largest purveyor of hate in America, according to the left. For these moral relativists truth is optional, malleable or oftentimes, irrelevant. Donald has committed the hate crime of proclaiming the emperor has no clothes. Never mind that he has probably employed more minorities than most liberals/progressives/democrats will ever meet in their unhappy (I have yet to meet a truly happy liberal/progressive/democrat) lifetimes. He is now officially a hater.

My mother and grandmother assimilated very well into their new country. This doesn’t mean they forgot their heritage or where they came from. As my grandmother proudly told anyone who asked about her accent, “I was born in Germany but I am an American now.’ Grandma went back to college at age 55 and earned a degree in journalism. She never demanded her instructors teach in her native German. I suspect she would have been profoundly offended if they had.

The real hate crime is that so many on the left, in order to feel good about themselves, are willing to sacrifice the rule of law, the well being of their country and lives of their fellow citizens.

The real hate crime in America today comes from liberals/progressives/democrats who know exactly what is best for you and dress up their desires to control you as compassion and understanding.

The real hate crime is that any immigrant who attempts my grandmothers path is derided by those same liberals/progressives/democrats for not being black/latino etc enough.

The real hate crime is that any immigrant who seeks the American dream today must do so in his native culture.

The real hate crime is that millions of Americans see their country, incorrectly, as the source of evil in the world.

The real hate crime is liberals/progressives/democrats are so willing to pit Americans against each other in every way they can think of. Black vs White, straight vs homosexual, rich vs poor, citizen vs illegal.

Perhaps the most hateful crime of all is the chosen ignorance of far to many people who call themselves Americans.

In 2014 alone illegal aliens released back into our communities were responsible for 80,000 criminal convictions. These are just the convictions. How many serious crimes were plea bargained away and how many were never resolved or even reported? Contemplate this for a minute. This means people like the mayor of San Francisco, the Kenyan and his supporters are just fine (as long as the illegals continue to vote democrat) with hundreds of murderers, sex offenders, kidnappers and thousands of drunk drivers running amuck in your community. How does this “tolerance” thing work again?

On this issue Donald is absolutely right, get over it.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Most Reviled Court In America And The Liberal Tolerance Tirade

Ever since the Kelo decision I have wondered just what the hell was wrong with the Supreme Court. In that travesty of justice it was declared legal for the government to steal, sorry, appropriate, your property and give it to another private entity on the basis that the new owner might provide some “public” good by, for example, increasing the tax base. The history of the actual Kelo development proves that theory false. Yet, the law remains and is many times abused.

In two days over three rulings this month the alleged justices have outdone themselves in the intellectual gymnastics department. It appears now that reason in the court has the life expectancy of a donut within 25 miles of Michael Moore.

In Obergefell v. Hodges justice Roberts (of whom I am no fan) wrote in his dissent
“The five Justices who compose today’s majority are entirely comfortable concluding that every State violated the Constitution for all of the 135 years between the Fourteenth Amendment’s ratification and Massachusetts’ permitting of same-sex marriages in 2003. They have discovered in the Fourteenth Amendment a ‘fundamental right’ overlooked by every person alive at the time of ratification, and almost everyone else in the time since. They see what lesser legal minds—minds like Thomas Cooley, John Marshall Harlan, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Learned Hand, Louis Brandeis, William Howard Taft, Benjamin Cardozo, Hugo Black, Felix Frankfurter, Robert Jackson, and Henry Friendly—could not. They are certain that the People ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to bestow on them the power to remove questions from the democratic process when that is called for by their ‘reasoned judgment.’ These Justices know that limiting marriage to one man and one woman is contrary to reason; they know that an institution as old as government itself, and accepted by every nation in history until 15 years ago, cannot possibly be supported by anything other than ignorance or bigotry. And they are willing to say that any citizen who does not agree with that, who adheres to what was, until 15 years ago, the unanimous judgment of all generations and all societies, stands against the Constitution.” This time he was exactly right.

In a side note two of the liberal judges that chose to impose gay marriage on America have spoken in defense of gay marriage and even performed gay marriage ceremonies. Ethical requirements demanded these two recuse themselves from the gay marriage case. Demonstrating their true liberal colors and devotion to situational ethics, they chose not to.

It only took a couple of days (they had to get the celebratory orgies out of the way first I’m sure) for the progressive whack jobs to start their “tolerance” tirades. Contemplate the alleged intelligent discourse from Jay Michaelson at the Daily Beast (a site best known for its minimal IQ requirements and slavish devotion to democratic talking points). This simulated intellectual exercise is both representative of liberal/progressive responses to the courts decision and filled with false premises so devoid of reason that it is difficult to know where to start when debunking it. In the interest of fairness I should point out one, he actually got he court citations correct and second, I will try to respond as simply as possible. I wouldn’t want to strain their apparently overtaxed intellectual capacities.

Michaelson begins with a question, “In controversial cases, is the role of jurist to inflame controversy, or quell it?”

The questions premise is false and the answer is neither. In its simplest terms the court is to be presented with a question. The court then applies the law as it is written, not as they would like it to be or as they think it should be, or as the polls suggest, to the question at hand within the bounds of the constitution. Controversy is to be dealt with by the people through their legislative representatives. You know like the 32 states that voted to codify what everyone has known for 6,000 years, that marriage is made up of a man and a women. For ideologues like Michaelson who view everything from the prism of liberal ideology and/or race, this is to much to ask for. He continues.

“In Loving v. Virginia, the 1967 case which found race-based marriage bands unconstitutional, Chief Justice Earl Warren built a 9-0 consensus—just as he’d done years earlier in Brown vs. Board of Education. He knew that a country divided by race ought to be united, if possible, by a Supreme Court mindful of fundamental values—even if the Court was, as the constitution requires, overturning the will of the majority.”

Michaelson either doesn’t know or doesn’t care (I suspect the latter) that most of the “racist” southern states at the time were, and had been governed for some time by democrats (ie people like himself). Again, the court is only to determine how to apply the law as written within the bounds of the constitution. He prefers to intimate that gay marriage is a civil right. It is clearly not. Still, he drones on.

“ The four dissents in the landmark case on same-sex marriage, Obergefell v. Hodges, one by each of the conservative justices on today’s Supreme Court, take a very different view. With invective and hyperbole, they pour fuel on the fire of the controversy over same-sex marriage. Rather than merely state their views and disagreements, they use heated language to accuse the five-person majority of imperialism, a “putsch,” and worse.”

Finally, we get to the overheated, allegedly intelligent criticism. How dare those pesky “conservatives” deign to disagree with his highness. Why I bet Michaelson even graduated from a prestigious school of journalism with a minor in how to change the world. What could some simple minded conservative teach him? Even worse, how dare a black conservative lecture him. The very nerve of justice Thomas. I’m guessing he was to distraught to remember that this same court, the same majority justices, in the DOMA case, stated that marriage was the domain of the state, not the federal government. Liberals have no use for precedent unless they want it. Still, he bloviates on.

“Thus, the unprecedented calls of elected officials for open revolt against the Supreme Court—a shocking display of treason—are now accompanied by calls from within the Court itself that Obergefell is illegitimate, and the Supreme Court itself no longer worthy of full respect.”

Apparently asking the court to stay within the bounds of the constitution or recognize a precedent set by the very same judges is a “shocking display of treason.” Michaelson clearly feels threatened by the dissenters micro aggressions of not thinking the same way he does and not caving instantly to his version of political correctness. After all, haven’t Boehner and McConnell shown the proper way for republicans to grovel? The four dissenting justices are correct in their belief that a court that cannot limit itself to its constitutionally defined borders is in fact illegitimate and not worthy of respect. Such a court, as we now seem to have, is merely an extension of whatever political party is in power.

I can summarize Michaelsons article this way. He obviously believes that five justices have the right, enumerated nowhere I might add, to assume in this case that, “They are certain that the People ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to bestow on them the power to remove questions from the democratic process when that is called for by their ‘reasoned judgment, (Justice Roberts). I can’t help but wonder if in Michaelson’s closed world, did the justices get the Citizens United ruling correct? Still anxious to inundate us with his superior intellect he warns direly.

“Why not just tell the Religious Right to buy pitchforks and blowtorches? Chief Justice Roberts’ ironic opinion is immoderate in alleging immoderacy, extreme in alleging extremism.

Justice Scalia came next. And he begins thus: “I join THE CHIEF JUSTICE’s opinion in full. I write separately to call attention to this Court’s threat to American democracy.”

It seems inevitable that rhetoric like this will stir the next Confederate flag-waving zealot to an act of, if not domestic terrorism, at least outrageous revolt. How could it be otherwise?”

Inevitable? I know Michaelson is drenched in liberal ideology to the point of breathlessness but even a casual perusal of history proves his prediction questionable at best. From simple minds come simple conclusions. Michaelson, if he would make the effort, would learn quickly that conservatives almost never commit “domestic terrorism” or acts of “outrageous revolt.” Well, except for microaggressing by not voting democrat. He is far to immersed in his ideology and democratic party talking points to know or even care that the kind of acts he bemoans are committed almost exclusively by liberals and liberal demagogues. His gratuitous insertion of the Confederate flag is also telling. Like all liberal lemmings he feels compelled to jump on the flag hate fest. He is clearly ignorant of the flags history and the history of the Civil War. It is true that some hateful people have adopted that flag as their symbol. That is just as corrupt as gays adopting the rainbow as their symbol for shoving their arms up someones rectum. And yes they actually do this.

Even so, Michaelson can take some comfort in the response of fellow “journalists.”

A Harrisburg, PA newspaper has announced that it intends to censor views about marriage it deems no better than racism, sexism, anti-Semitism.

John L. Micek, editorial page editor, former state capital reporter and ferocious defender of free speech (okay, I made up the last one), made an announcement after the Supreme Court forced gay marriage on the county. He wrote, “As a result of Friday’s ruling, PennLive/The Patriot-News will no longer accept, nor will it print, op-Eds and letters to the editor in opposition to same sex marriage.”

When called out on his decision to limit free speech he took to his Twitter account to confirm his displeasure with any who dared to disagree with him. Said Micek, “This is not hard: We would not print racist, sexist, or anti-Semitic letters. To that we add homophobic ones. Pretty simple.” Simple? What I’m sure he meant but couldn’t bring himself to say was simpleminded.

When his condescending remarks failed to cool the flames, Micek tried to walk his intolerance back just a bit, “Clarification: We will not foreclose discussion of the high court’s decision, but arguments that gay marriage is wrong/unnatural are out.”

Micek goes on to compare opposition to same-sex marriage to “hate speech.” Translation, only those who agree need appear. So it will go with much of the media.

Given the lefts devotion to hate it is a certainty that Christians like myself will be targeted for what can only be described as persecution. Their hate fest has been going on piecemeal to date but now, hiding behind the skirts of five liberal/progressive judges the militant homosexuals will begin targeting in earnest as soon as the next orgy is over.

The two most pressing questions for me now are, how did we get to this point and what should we do next.

Craige McMillan described the path to this point in a recent column, “Washington, D.C., is now an echo chamber filled with pompous people-pleasers and others with checkbooks at the ready who want to be pleased. With enough money in hand, voters become irrelevant because they can be manipulated once every few years.

There is no moral compass guiding our nation’s decisions. The result with these finger-in-the-air types is situational ethics, contradictory laws and enforcement, and ultimately chaos – which destroys the many for the benefit of the few. Therefore, sexual license now automatically entitles one to a marriage license – which states cannot deny. Children become chattel. And that most basic right – conscience – is to be denied the many in service of the DC cocktail circuit.”

As for what to do next? Former lesbian Janet Boynes offers the following, “We are living in times where our faith will be tested. These are times in which we will be ridiculed for our beliefs and perhaps even incarcerated for holding the word of God as our voice of truth. As someone who has walked away from homosexuality and now has a ministry that helps men and women who desire to come out of this lifestyle, I have the responsibility to stay grounded in what I know is true. But it doesn’t stop there; you, also have the responsibility to remain steadfast without caving in to the pressures of this world. … The Supreme Court cannot redefine what they didn’t create.” Amen sister.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Greatest Generation And The Dirt Road

Anyone who knows me knows I venerate (all you public school graduates will simply have to look up the meaning of the word) my grandparents. I especially venerate my grandfather. He was in many ways as much my father as my dad was. My dad served in the U.S Army his entire adult life. He died in a car accident with 24 years of service. A tour in Vietnam, numerous other assignments and a sincere devotion to drink kept him from a normal family life. My grandfather, may he rest in peace, willingly stepped into the role of substitute father. He was truly part of the greatest generation.

At the tender age of four he began tending crops with his parents, owners of a small farm in east Texas. When he was old enough he joined the Navy. Because of extreme seasickness he was transferred to the Army where he served in the field artillery. When the Army formed the Army Air Corp he got himself transferred into the predecessor of the U.S. Air Force. He went with the Army Air Corp when it became the Air Force and retired from the USAF with 23 years total service.

In my family grandpas world war two service (the first four years in the Pacific then transferred to Germany in Jan 1945 where he stayed through the Berlin airlift) was something talked about quietly when he was not around. In the innocence of youth I had always thought of WWII as some kind of job. Get up, shower, eat breakfast, go to war, have lunch, go back to war for awhile then go home. I had no idea what a war was. It wasn’t until we studied WWII in history that I learned the truth about the second world war. Then, in my innocence I pictured my grandpa, rifle in hand, charging at the enemy who turned tail and ran away in fear. After all, this was the man who chopped of the heads of the rattlesnakes that always seemed to be living under the riding lawnmower. It was my chore to mow the lawn and I cannot ever remember a time I didn’t have to call on grandpa first.

Later my curiosity finally got the better of me. I think I was twelve, I asked Paul (my grandpas name) what he did in the war. At first I thought he might not answer me. He finally told me he had been a crew chief. I had no idea what a crew chief was but since he was a chief I figured he had to be in charge of something. I probed some more. “Well,” he offered “it was my job to make sure my plane was fixed and ready to go when it was needed.” He smiled a little then added, “B-17, B-29, B-25, even some fighters, there was nothing I couldn’t fix.” His smile suddenly faded as he added, “Well, almost nothing I couldn’t fix.”

The almost nothing comment grabbed a hold of my curiosity and would not let go. “What was it you couldn’t fix, grandpa,” I asked full of childish naivete. I remember to this day the look of sadness that overtook his nearly always joyful demeanor. I didn’t understand it at the time but I think I do now. In that moment, he had gone back to those dark days. He was there, reliving something he had worked long and hard to forget. In the quietest voice I had ever heard him use he said only, “I could never clean up the blood.” He put his hand on my skinny little shoulder, looked at me for a minute and then went into his room. Unsure what had just transpired but knowing I had been dismissed I went into the living room and sat down. A few minutes later grandma came out and said it would be best if we didn’t ask grandpa anymore war questions. The look on her face made it more like a royal commandment. It was a request I would honor for the next 25 years.

Sitting on the couch, neck deep in my blessed youthful ignorance I was thinking of some poor guy getting cut on a piece of metal and bleeding a bit on the floor of the bomber. I could not square that image with my grandpas remark. After all, when I had crashed my bike and slid halfway down Red Wreck hill, losing most of the skin on my left side, it was grandpa that carried me into the bathroom and cleaned and dressed my wounds. I had bled a lot that day as he pulled out pebbles and blacktop from my open wounds and grandpa never flinched. It wasn’t until much later that I learned many wounded airmen were allowed to bleed out and die in order to save another plane with less fuel by allowing it to land first. A crew of thirteen men can leave a lot of blood on the floor.

When grandpa retired he got a job as a jet engine mechanic in Dallas. It was a great job that had the advantages of paying well enough for him to live out in his beloved country and being something that he loved to do. On the downside it was a ninety-mile commute, one way. Still, there was one co-worker who lived even farther out than grandpa. To minimize expenses he would drive to grandpas house and ride to work with grandpa. Grandpa would pick up two others on the way in to work. To make the whole thing work he would get up at three am. Unable to contemplate three am as a child (I hated getting up at six am for school) I once asked him how in the world he could get up so early. “Whether I like to get up so early or not is not important,” he said, “it needs to be done so I do it.” Classic grandpa.

The man who taught me how to drive at age twelve (much to grandmas frustration) also mislead me on how to buy a car. As grandpa nearly always worked six days a week and sometimes seven days a week he put a lot of miles on his cars. Every year he would buy a new car. He took me with him once. We drove to the Chevrolet dealer in the small town ten miles down the road. As grandpa pulled into the parking lot a man came out to greet him. “Hello Paul,” he said as grandpa handed him the keys to his car. “Time for a new car?” Grandpa said yes and the man told him to look around, when he found what he wanted, just let him know. A few minutes later grandpa settled on a four door Impla. We went inside and the man gave him the keys to the new car, said the paperwork would be ready tomorrow and asked if that would be okay. Grandpa said yes and we drove off in a shiny new car. For longer than I will admit to that is how I thought people bought cars.

Whether it was making sure I had fed the cows before school or done my homework grandpa was always there. A lifelong practitioner of self-reliance, every moment was a teachable moment. If something broke you fixed it. If you couldn’t fix it then you hired the best man for the job and paid him a fair price. One of the things he excelled at was patience. He often took me and my brothers swimming at the local lake. Once he gave me four quarters for the juke box. At three songs per quarter I picked Bostons “More Than A Feeling” 12 times. Thinking he might not appreciate that I only chose the one song I asked him if he was okay with that. Smiling at me he asked, “Is it the best song in there?” I piped up right away, it was (and still is) the best song ever. “Then you did good.” I felt like a million bucks right then. The fact is grandpa was a big band fan. I suspect the music blaring across the lake that day meant nothing to him and was probably quite annoying but you would have never known it by looking at him.

I remember him making me come inside from playing on the day of the Apollo moon landing. We watched it on a 13 inch black and white tv set. He was so proud of what America had just accomplished. I remember sitting with him on Sundays and watching grandpas “Cowboys” play football. While I don’t know if he ever played football he would explain the game to me. I played in high school and Tom Landry is still one of my heroes.

The first time I heard the song I knew Grandpa had journeyed through his life on Sawyer Browns famous “Dirt Road.” He taught us to respect our elders, study diligently (not hard, there is a difference), stay out of trouble, work hard when required, work smart always and do it right the first time. While he never went to church he had a vast knowledge of scripture and would sometimes quote a passage or bible story to illustrate a point. He taught me to never confuse what is easy with what was right. One of the most valuable lessons I learned from him was that some things are wrong simply because they are wrong. He helped me develop my love of history, reading, football (I am still a Cowboys fan) and coffee. Although he managed to make and save a lot of money he never became enamored of it. Instead of living the high life he preferred to go fishing with us kids, sit in his easy chair with a good book, go for walks on the country road he lived on (our nearest neighbor was a quarter of a mile away) or have a cup of coffee on the porch in the morning and feed/watch the birds.

As I look back on my fifty some years I realize there is a lot of him in me. I too have spent my life on that dirt road and that is fine with me. Despite my best efforts with my kids and grandkids I can’t help but feel like a pale imitation of my grandpa. Todays silicon valley addled, five second attention span, politically correct indoctrinated young people have no idea what they have lost or how far they have fallen. The humble, character building dirt road has been replaced by the slickly marketed electronic superhighway of instant gratification, electronic anonymity and basement dwelling zombieism. I find that to be truly tragic and, more than anything, I miss my grandpa.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Cult Of Islam

I recently came across an article that confirmed a long held suspicion of mine. The article titled Characteristics Associated with Cultic Groups – Revised, by Janja Lalich, Ph.D. & Michael D. Langone, Ph.D. is revealing to those willing to see islam as it really is, a death worshipping cult. What a minute I hear you saying, what do you mean as it really is? Islam is a religion of peace, the Kenyan has deemed it so, so what could be wrong there? Ah Grasshopper, again the pebble eludes you.

I have made some studies of islam. I do not claim expert status but expert status is not needed to understand what the practitioners of islam are saying. It certainly does not require expert status to understand islams predilection for persecution and murder. After reading the islamic holy book which I will not give the dignity of a name, it is clear that hate and persecution are the stock in trade of islam. Strip away all the “thees and thous” from islam and you are left with a combination street gang/cult.

Lalich and Langone state that they consider the patterns listed in their paper as analytical tools rather than diagnostic tools. I think these patterns diagnose cults quite well. They add that, “many members, former members, and supporters of cults are not fully aware of the extent to which members may have been manipulated, exploited, even abused.” That describes nearly every defender of islam I have ever heard. I except from that last sentence the many alleged muslim “leadership” and “rights” groups, they know about the manipulation, torture, rape and murder but pretty much don’t care.

So, lets compare the patterns listed by Lalich and Langone to islam.

The first pattern listed says, “The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader and (whether he is alive or dead) regards his belief system, ideology, and practices as the Truth, as law.” Is there any doubt that this is a foundation of islam? Is not the killing of those who draw cartoons excessively zealous? How about murdering rape victims for having sex outside of marriage? Is that unquestioning commitment?

The second pattern listed says, “Questioning, doubt, and dissent are discouraged or even punished.” Change the should be punished to must be punished and you have islamic law. This brings to mind the story of the islamist mother who killed her seven year old son because he didn’t progress in his islamic studies as fast as she wanted him to. Islam does not allow dissent in any form, ever.

The third pattern listed says, “Mind-altering practices (such as meditation, chanting, speaking in tongues, denunciation sessions, and debilitating work routines) are used in excess and serve to suppress doubts about the group and its leader(s).” Sitting in quiet contemplation (meditation) is not a function of islam. The islamic school focuses virtually no attention on what we in the west would consider education. You don’t need to know how to read or write to detonate a bomb vest. The Madrasa’s function is to initiate its students into the world of hate and violence. Chanting and denunciation sessions they have down to a science.

The fourth pattern listed says, “The leadership dictates, sometimes in great detail, how members should think, act, and feel (for example, members must get permission to date, change jobs, marry—or leaders prescribe what types of clothes to wear, where to live, whether or not to have children, how to discipline children, and so forth).” Really? Do I have to explain this one? Can you say, burkas, dietary restrictions, muslim only zones, rules on how to beat your wife. All this evil and more is known as Sharia law.

The fifth pattern listed says, “The group is elitist, claiming a special, exalted status for itself, its leader(s) and members (for example, the leader is considered the Messiah, a special being, an avatar—or the group and/or the leader is on a special mission to save humanity).” Allah and his henchman Mohammed are so exalted that their authority is not allowed to be questioned, ever. The devout muslim has a religious duty to spread islam at any cost and by any means. Can you say Caliphate?

The sixth pattern says, “The group has a polarized us-versus-them mentality, which may cause conflict with the wider society.” I will let the islamist respond to this one, “Kill all the Jews and non-believers.” What other “mainstream” religion do you know that teaches their children how to kill people?

The seventh pattern listed says, “The leader is not accountable to any authorities (unlike, for example, teachers, military commanders or ministers, priests, monks, and rabbis of mainstream religious denominations).” When is the last time you heard about a mullah, imam or jihadi being prosecuted under islamic law for theft, assault, child abuse, rape, torture or murder? I thought not. In fact, under islamic law doing any of these things in the furtherance of islam is deemed praiseworthy. Can anyone remember the rape gangs that operated unopposed in England for fourteen years? (And don’t talk to me about the one or two people who may end up in jail over this. Thousands of muslims and their British enablers in the government will go scott free. The victims may never recover.)

The eighth pattern listed says, “The group teaches or implies that its supposedly exalted ends justify whatever means it deems necessary. This may result in members’ participating in behaviors or activities they would have considered reprehensible or unethical before joining the group (for example, lying to family or friends, or collecting money for bogus charities).” Can you say Taqiyya? For those do not know, Taqiyya is the islamic approved doctrine/process that allows a muslim to lie, cheat, steal and even deny his faith in his effort to infiltrate a group/country and further the spread of islam. The Kenyan little Barry is Americas foremost practitioner of Taqiyya.

The ninth pattern listed says, “The leadership induces feelings of shame and/or guilt in order to influence and/or control members. Often, this is done through peer pressure and subtle forms of persuasion.” Can you say honor killings? How about the death sentence for apostasy? Are you a homosexual, death is the only option under islam. What about chopping off the hands of a thief? Rape is a preferred method of intimidation and control. Islam is not a cult of subtlety.

The tenth pattern listed says, “Subservience to the leader or group requires members to cut ties with family and friends, and radically alter the personal goals and activities they had before joining the group.” The foundational tenant of islam is not that the individual should perfect himself and help his family to do the same so that they can be together in the afterlife, it is that the believer must advance islam by any means necessary. This includes sacrificing himself and his family should the opportunity present it self.

The eleventh pattern listed says, “The group is preoccupied with bringing in new members.” The islamists tell you straight up, everyone must convert to islam. For those who refuse to convert islamic law provides only two options, slavery or death.

The twelfth pattern listed says, “The group is preoccupied with making money.” This is the best disguised tenant of islam. No imam or ayatollah would subject himself to the poverty he forces those under him to endure.

The thirteenth pattern listed says, “Members are expected to devote inordinate amounts of time to the group and group-related activities.” Islam doesn’t require an inordinate amount of time, it demands all of your time.

The fourteenth pattern listed says, “Members are encouraged or required to live and/or socialize only with other group members.” This basic tenant of islam is making a gruesome comeback. Islamists are torturing, raping and killing tens of thousands of men, women and children for no other reason than these poor souls are not muslim. This also applies to things. The muslims are destroying thousands of years of history because it is not muslim history.

The fifteenth pattern listed says, “The most loyal members (the “true believers”) feel there can be no life outside the context of the group. They believe there is no other way to be, and often fear reprisals to themselves or others if they leave (or even consider leaving) the group.” This reminds me of the story I read not to long ago about a palistinian child who had received medical treatment in an Israeli hospital. The mother of the child said in an interview that she was glad her child had been saved and could not wait for the day when her child would strap on a bomb and kill Jews. She considers herself to be a devout muslim. I consider her mentally ill.

Sadly, all these tenants of islam have been successfully imported into the USA under the guise of tolerance. Dearborn, MI is well on its way to becoming a mini Iran within our borders. Why anyone should tolerate such behavior and attitudes is beyond me. Only the twisted intellectual gymnastics of your average liberal could justify the tolerance of such abhorrent behavior. Then again, liberals like muslims, are a culture of death, but that’s another article.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Gay Agenda Forced me To Create A New Word

Someone recently posted on facebook a picture showing two Mormon missionaries knocking on a door. The caption reads, The Gay Agenda? When was the last time a gay person knocked on your door asking if you would like to hear the good news of Elton John? Sadly, this is what passes for informed opinion. There is so much wrong with the aforementioned question and the thought process that would generate it that I almost don’t know where to start. So, lets examine just a couple of concepts involved with this post.

I will start with the obvious targeting of Christians via Latter Day Saint missionaries. Full disclosure here, I am a member of the LDS faith and have been for forty years. For the record missionaries are taught to not be rude or overbearing. The easiest way to rid your self of an LDS missionary is to politely ask them to leave. It works every time. A no soliciting sign will accomplish the same thing if you are afraid to talk with young men or women who believe in God enough to sacrifice two years of their lives to share their stories with others.

If you think having a polite conversation or hanging a sign out is to much to ask then you should try being the owner of a pizza shop that doesn’t want to cater a gay wedding. The homosexual community saw the vile hatred poured upon on those poor folks as not only being justified but as being a required response. No real Christian/LDS missionary could even contemplate such a mindset, let alone act in such a reprehensible manner. How about instead of getting your opinions of Christians/LDS missionaries from politically correct sources you try the unthinkable, actually talk with them.

Second, let us be honest here, the gay community doesn’t need to knock on our doors. Their friends in hollywood and the media are in slavish overdrive trying to convince the 98.4% (CDC numbers not mine) of Americans who are not gay that being a homosexual is all that and a bag of chips. Add the muslim in chiefs forcing the preference of gays throughout the military and you have just begun to scratch the surface of the gay agenda. Yes Virginia, there is a gay agenda.

The federal government is now well into actively forcing the gay agenda into the schools. In this regard, schools today are an especially dangerous place for children.

Example, in Virginia, the states largest school district has begun expanding its “non-discrimination policy” to accommodate transgender teachers and students. The policy applies to students as early as preschool and allows teachers to stay in the classroom if they declare themselves to be a different gender and conduct themselves accordingly. When made aware of the coming change in district policy many parents became rightfully outraged. The school district, modeling the Kenyan little Barrys policy of transparency, promptly excluded the parents from school board meetings on the issue. The opposing parents are rightly concerned for privacy of their kids should “transgender” adults or students be allowed access to locker rooms and restrooms opposite of their biological gender.

In California, a state which abandoned reason decades ago, and Colorado, a state whose leadership seeks to emulate California, so called “School Bathroom” bills have been passed. In a nutshell these lunatic state legislators have decided that it is perfectly acceptable for a 14-year-old boy to just “declare” himself a girl and use the girls bathrooms. As a former 14 year old boy who had many 14 year old boys as friends and father of girls I don’t need a graduate degree to tell me there will be no good coming out of this stupidity. Careful examination of who supported, funded and pushed for these assassins of decency disguised as tolerance to become law has militant gay fingerprints all over it. Apparently teaching kindergarten age boys that anal sex with other boys is a normal tendency wasn’t enough for these perverts (sorry but teaching kindergarten boys how to have anal sex is perverted in my book). The absolute right to indoctrinate and recruit your children into a deviant lifestyle is a part of the gay agenda that must not be questioned.

Of course the practicing homosexual judge in California who ignored the will of the voters that passed Proposition 8 had no agenda. He just happened to be presiding over a case where he could benefit from his ruling, ie deciding that prop 8 was unconstitutional. Lawyers not beholden to the gay lobby call that a conflict of interest and correctly point out that the judge should have recused himself. That this judge chose his ideology over sound legal judgment and reasonable ethical practice should surprise no one paying attention. This judges sole intention from the beginning was to force normalcy on his chosen lifestyle. That too, is part of the agenda.

The gay agenda, if it isn’t clear enough yet, becomes unavoidable when considering the plight of decent God fearing Christians. We Christians must be destroyed en masse by the gay lobby because they are painfully aware that there is simply no scriptural support for their deviant lifestyle. After years of diligent study they can’t even find a scripture to misinterpret as supporting their lifestyle. There are plenty of scriptural condemnations of their behavior though. God makes it perfectly and unambiguously clear, homosexuality is not just wrong but vilely wrong.

The conduct of radical gay activists has gone from simple activism to, at times, out right terrorism. Even today words mean things. Based on their actions alone I have been required to come up with a more accurate term to describe them, homoterrorist. The homoterrorist lobby is a growing, often federally funded and actively militant group that does not seek tolerance. They demand unconditional endorsement. Don’t believe me, then consider the following.

Aloha Bed & Breakfast. A Hawaiian Christian owned business, The Aloha Bed & Breakfast was targeted by a pair of alleged homoterrorists Taeko Bufford and Diane Cervelli when the owner stated she wasn’t comfortable having the lesbians stay together in her home due to her religious beliefs.

Arlene’s Flowers. Florist Barronelle Stutzman owner of Arlene’s Flowers in Richland, Washington was fined $1,001 for refusing to provide flowers for a gay wedding. To further demonstrate his hatred of Christians the judge (and apparent coconspirator), Alex Ekstrom has opened Stutzmans savings, personal possessions and even her home up as a sacrifice to the apparent homoterrorist couple. Alleged homoterrorists Robert Ingersoll and Curt Freed were referred to several other willing florists and were even offered free flowers. It seems obvious that getting flowers for the sad event was not their intent. Apparently, getting their sorry faces in the news by attacking a grandmother seems to have been the goal here. The money being extorted from this poor women by the state is just a bonus I’m sure.

Benham Brothers. The popular and successful Benham brothers Jason and David were well into the creation of a new HGTV television show called “Flip it Forward” when the homoterrorist lobby began their crying campaign over the brothers belief in the biblical definition of marriage. In a stunning lack of corporate courage (or apparent coconspirator status?) the network canceled the show.

Brendan Eich. Being rich and powerful is also no protection from the homoterroist. Remember Brendan Eich, CEO of Mozilla, the company that created Firefox. In 2008 he gave $1,000 in support of proposition 8, a marriage-definition initiative that was approved by the majority of California voters. Mr. Eich was brutally attacked and eventually lost his job. Yet one more sacrifice to the homoterrorists.

Brian Klawiter the mechanic. When Brian Klawiter of Grandville, Michigan, said he would decline to provide service to openly homosexual customers it didn’t take the homoterrorists long to demonstrate their version of tolerance. Death threats against him and his family, posting gay porn shots on his Facebook page, spray painting graffiti on his vehicles and home and at least one rock thrown through a window are the minim response required by the homotolerance brigade.

Craig James. Even the so-called conservative media isn’t immune to homoterrorism. Fox Sports Southwest broadcaster Craig James was fired after a GOP debate tape surfaced showing him expressing Christian beliefs in opposition to homosexual marriage.
Elane’s Photography. Jonathan and Elaine Huguenin, owners of Elane Photography in New Mexico were told by the states highest court that they do not have the right to refuse to photograph gay weddings. Exercising it’s Stalinist tendencies and illustrating its ignorance of the constitution (and displaying its coconspirator status?) the court said sacrificing ones religious beliefs was, “the price of citizenship.”

Hitching Post Wedding Chapel. Pastor Knapp and The Hitching Post wedding chapel in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, were targeted by the city for refusing to perform gay weddings. The case is back in court after the city refused to allow the pastor to exercise his mainstream religious beliefs.

Just Cookies. In Indiana the owners of “Just Cookies” were charged with discrimination under their city’s “sexual orientation” law for refusing to fill a special order for “rainbow cookies” for a homosexual group.

Liberty Ridge Farm. Cynthia and Robert Gifford, owners of Liberty Ridge Farm in upstate New York were fined $10,000 and assessed $1,500 in damages for not allowing a pair lesbians to use their home for a wedding. Apparent homoterrorists Jennifer McCarthy and Melisa Erwin were upset that the Giffords would allow a reception but not a wedding on their property. In a mind bending display of intellectual gymnastics, Administrative Law Judge (and apparent coconspirator) Migdalia Pares said the Giffords’ home is a place of public accommodation thus subject to the New York Human Rights law. “The fact that the Giffords also reside at Gifford Barn does not render it private,” said Pares.

Masterpiece Cakeshop. Jack Phillips of Masterpiece Cakeshop was ordered by The Colorado Civil Rights Commission to celebrate homosexual unions with the baking of wedding cakes in violation of his Christian beliefs. Last I heard the case is on appeal in the courts. State commissioner (and apparent co-conspirator) Diann Rice, illustrated her tolerance toward Christians by equating them to slave owners and Nazis.

Memories Pizza. Owners of family-owned Memories Pizza in Indiana Kevin and Christie O’Connor experienced homoterrorism up close and personal when they declined to cater a hypothetical gay wedding. Death threats against the family and threatened destruction of property caused the family to close their pizzeria. In what can only be seen as a resounding repudiation of the homoterrorists an internet campaign generated some $840,000 for the terrorized family in just a few days.

North Carolina Magistrates. Even being protected by a state constitution does not deter the homoterrorist. North Carolina Magistrates Gilbert Breedlove and Thomas Holland have sued in Wake County Superior Court over direct orders to perform gay weddings and threats to be removed from the bench and or prosecuted criminally by the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts if they don’t. Unknown to the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts the state constitution protects those who live by their faith. It is a sad testament to the effectiveness of the homoterrorist that a magistrate should be forced to sue his state to remind them of their constitutional duties. The two magistrates are asking the state to follow its own constitution, return them to their jobs with an acknowledgment that they are not required to perform same sex weddings.

Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association. History is also no protection against the homoterrorist. Established in 1869, Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association was created to be a place for Christian meetings and assemblies. This made it a very attractive target for two apparent homoterrorists, Harriet Bernstein and Luisa Paster. Because of these two and their apparent accomplice, Solomon A. Metzger of the state’s Office of Administrative Law, the location no longer is used for weddings.

Phil Robertson. When evangelical Christian and “Duck Dynasty” star Phil Robertson had the audacity to say in an interview that he believed homosexuality is a sin the homoterrorists slipped into their high heels and went into overdrive. In another shining example of corporate cowardice (or conspirator status?) A&E network tried to suspend him from the show indefinitely. A massive public firestorm in support of Phil caused the network to reinstate him.

Sweet Cakes by Melissa. Bakery owners Aaron and Melissa Klein of, Gresham, Oregon were forced to close their storefront, Sweet Cakes by Melissa, in 2013 shortly after a pair of apparent lesbian homoterrorists filed a civil rights complaint against them for declining to bake them a cake. Same-sex marriage was not legal in Oregon at the time. To reward the homoterrorists and I suspect ensure funding for the next round of attacks an Oregon administrative law judge (and apparent coconspirator?) ordered the Kleins to pay $135,000 in fines to their attackers for “emotional, mental, and physical suffering.”

Twilight Room Annex. Chris Penner, the owner of the Twilight Room Annex bar in Portland, was fined $400,000 under the Oregon Equality Act. His crime? He began excluding transsexual men who dressed as women and were using the women’s restroom. This understandably upset and worried the real women who also used the bathroom. Members of the apparent homoterrorist association (11 members) going by the name of the “T-girls” will get awards from $20,000 to 50,000 each. Oregon is clearly engaging in its own version of the war on women.

Walders. Jim and Beth Walder, Christian Bed and Breakfast owners in Illinois, are being sued by apparent homoterrorist Todd Wathen because they will not abandon their Christian beliefs on marriage.

Wildflower Inn. The Wildflower Inn in Vermont paid a settlement and shut down its wedding reception business after the homoterrorist enabling ACLU won a $10,000 civil penalty for a pair of lesbians. The inn’s owners are required to place $20,000 in a charitable trust so the lesbians can celebrate their victory over Christianity with what I can only describe as legally extorted funds.

There are more examples but I think the trend is clear. Compare the actions of these apparent homoterrorists to that of former pastor Joshua Feuerstein. Cut the Cake in Longwood, Florida, is a bakery that advertised it services on gay supportive websites. When asked to provide a cake that opposed gay weddings Cut the Cake declined. Rather than sue Joshua Feuerstein said in a tv interview, “You know what, I actually believe that Cut the Cake has every right as an American to refuse to print that on a cake.” This is exactly how tolerance works. The pastor is not offended by the denial of service he is simply pointing out the homoterrorist hypocrisy. The homosexual baker of course, is contemplating suing for damages.

There is a gay agenda. It is the state sanctioned, federal government approved targeting of Christians and their beliefs. The model has been worked and perfected once already with so called hate crimes. One of the main homoterrorist goals now is to criminalize those who adhere to their religious beliefs. These one per centers will not be stopped. There will soon be a whole new category of crimes, faith crimes. Only the blind can not see the writing on the wall and I honestly believe that level of blindness cannot exist naturally, it must be chosen.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Stupid Rioters, Temper Tantrums Are For Kids

My mom once told me the fastest way to be offended was to go looking for offense. Given the current cottage industry of being outraged every time some genius gets himself killed by the police I sense the black community, at least in some areas, is looking pretty damn hard to be offended. Lets be honest here, according to the so called Justice Department over the last few years nearly twice as many white people were killed by police than blacks. It would seem, so says the government, the fastest way to be killed by the cops is to be white, not black.

Even so, I might could understand at least some of the outrage if the “victims” of the police had been straight A student choir boy types. The fact is that in nearly every case the “victims” were either street level thugs, had criminal histories and either resisted arrest or actively fought with the police. Given the mindset of todays average rap loving criminal they apparently felt they could escalate their way out of being arrested. One wonders if these gangster wannabes had visions of glory in their heads thinking they could kill a cop and gain immortality through a rap song extolling their exploits. Those of us who reside in the real world know and accept that no police officer is required to allow himself to harmed to satisfy a twisted sense of black entitlement. Hey all you poverty pimps and race hustlers, get over it.

To my mind, the rioters in Baltimore, Ferguson etc are proof that far to many blacks have traded in their humanity for a welfare check and an attitude. They base their actions on a lie that their own justice department has proven. Allow me to repeat myself, the fact is the fastest way to get shot by the police today is to be white.

Sadly, the facts are irrelevant. The rioters and those who egg them on, hide behind the twin myths of racism and poverty.

You want to talk about poverty? I knew a young lady in the Philippines who literally lived in a pallet built shack that had a corrugated tin roof and a dirt floor. Her only other possessions were the bamboo mat she slept on, a deck of playing cards and the few clothes she had wadded up in one corner. When I asked her about her poverty she said she didn’t have time to worry about it, she was getting an education and saving as much money as she could so that someday she could live in an actual home.

Sorry rioters, in the poverty game, you lose.

The only poverty the looters in Baltimore, Ferguson etc suffer from is a poverty of character, human decency, empathy and reason. I am sure after an exciting day of looting and rioting most of these so called activists run to their government paid for homes, switch on their flatscreen TV’s and stuff their faces with government provided food while they wait to see if they got their sorry faces on tv.

You want to talk about racism? Have you listened to the filth you call rap? Talk about mindless self induced abuse. How is rap even music? How does your choosing to wallow in the gutters of the music world make me a racist?

You want to talk about racism? I will wager a solid majority of these so called activists have chosen to abandon education to nurse pumped up grievances and run around in the streets. How does your choice to remain ignorant and act stupidly make me a racist? If you choose to remain uneducated you have still made a choice. And don’t even try to tell me the knock out game isn’t as racist as it comes. Racism is alive and well but only in the democratic party and much of the “black” communities “leadership”.

I will tell you something your rap music, public educators and race hustling poverty pimps wont. It is unpleasant. It is unavoidable. Drum roll please. Every choice you make comes with consequences. While you get to choose your course of action you do not get to choose your consequences.

Finally, a bonus for those who have stuck this out to its end. Bad choices often lead to bad outcomes. Sometimes bad choices lead to tragic outcomes and in real life tragedy cares not what color your skin is.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized