The Iranian Project

During WWII (a subject our children are tragically mis-educated about) the US Army became increasingly concerned about the number of potential soviet spies within the Roosevelt administration. So concerned where the top brass that they set up a secret intelligence gathering project without white house knowledge or approval on the president and his advisers. Contrary to current historical opinion (liberals/progressives refuse to deal in facts in this instance) Joe McCarthy was wrong not in fact but in number. According to the KGB archives accessed after the fall of the Berlin wall, the Roosevelt administration was riddled with hundreds of soviet spies. They were everywhere from his closest advisers to mid level policy wonks to low level functionaries. The soviet success did not go unnoticed. Someone in Iran it seems was paying very close attention.

Many people believe the Kenyan is a militant muslim deeply engaged in the islamic practice of Taqiyya, the great deception allowed to muslims for the advancement of islam. Given his constant assaults on Christianity and deferral to islam it is difficult to refute such an allegation. After all, this is the president who even now insists on deporting Christian families back to the middle east to be at best persecuted and most likely murdered. In this death sentence the Kenyan insists he is practicing tolerance and understanding. Tolerance and understanding for who I have to ask.

Even to the casual observer the Kenyans commitment to islam and Taqiyya should be painfully evident. The Kenyan has admitted that the muslim morning call to prayer is the “sweetest sound on earth” and then issued the call perfectly. He was educated in Indonesia where islam is required to be taught. Then there was the bow to the Saudi King. No president has ever done such a thing. Nor is there any reason he should. A practicing muslim has no choice but to bow to those over him. But, but I hear from the peanut gallery, the Kenyan says he is a Christian. He was just following protocol/being polite etc. Wrong princess, he was doing no such thing. He has said he is a Christian but there is no proof. (Sorry, there is nothing Christian about the sick “church” of the so called Rev Wright that the Kenyan attended for 20 years. Hate of that breadth and depth comes from Satan not Christ.) The main point here is that even engaged in Taqiyya the devout muslim must bow down to his superiors, thus the Kenyan bowed, confirming to anyone willing to see he is a practicing muslim.

By no means is that the only example. Am I really the only one who has noticed that neither the Kenyan or his former secretary of state go anywhere or make a decision without their Iranian advisors consent. The Kenyan literally cannot be separated from Valorie Jarett and Mrs. Clinton has Huma at her side constantly. Jarett has never attempted to hide her militant islamic tendencies and is on record as working to replace the Constitution with sharia law. Huma and her family are deeply and inextricably entrenched within the muslim brotherhood.

We know that muslim brotherhood members now have senior positions in the government. Like the soviets before them they then fill the ranks below them with fellow islamic militants and even worse, sleepers (agents who remain invisible until called to strike). Consider the fact that much of our government may now be in the hands of a militant islamic sleeper cells.

You doubt me I’m sure. Let me really make your head spin then. What if the Kenyan, through Mrs. Jarett, arranged to have Seal Team Six assassinated? From a patriotic American prospective that makes no sense. But to a muslim practicing Taqiyya, it fits hand in glove. This action would serve two purposes. First and foremost, Seal Team Six’s assault on islam could not be allowed to stand. Second, it served as a clear signal that the Kenyans loyalties had not shifted. The Kenyan and Mrs. Jarett simply may have done what any good muslim would have done. And yes, Jarett would have access to the teams classified movements through senior and compliant military commanders. As a theory it makes enough sense to scare anyone paying attention to death. But I am not yet done.

Does anyone besides me and Trey Gowdey remember Benghazi? What if this was another revenge attack? September 11th is a very important day in islamic history and now, because of islam, in our history. Huma, through her position, undoubtedly knew Ambassador Stevens would not only be at the annex but also knew he would be virtually undefended. This information could have then been easily been passed by her to her relatives/friends in the muslim brotherhood. The U.S. military, as it has done forever, wanted to defend/rescue those under siege. They were denied. And yes, there was a stand down order given. That order could only come lawfully from the president. Do you still have any questions? I see.

As a muslim deep in the practice of Taqiyya the Kenyan continues his all out assault on islams greatest enemy, the U.S.A. Islamic punks like Iran know they could never defeat America openly. So they do the only thing they can. They have a long history of destabilizing countries so, looking at “the great satan” they employ their most successful tactic, destabilization. The Kenyan has succeeded beyond the Iranians wildest dreams. Ponder America today and the tragic amount of damage the Kenyan, his vile minions, useful idiots and blinded supporters have managed to accomplish on behalf of their islamic masters.

He returned Iraq and Afghanistan to brutal islamic fundamentalists to use as a base of operations against us. This gave them both safe ground to operate on and oil revenue to fund their operations and buy weapons. A side bonus is the insult this offered to all those brave Americans, Iraqis and Afgans who died to bring peace to the region. In some islamic circles that insult alone was more than worth the price of admission.

He has given funds and weapons to our enemies all over the world. He gave guns to Mexican drug lords and the muslim brotherhood while turning a blind eye to weapons shipments into Gaza and the West bank. The blood of hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of innocents across the world drips from the Kenyans hands unnoticed by a generation of liberals/progressives trained to be consumed with being “offended” by the latest new and unusual “offenses” and “microaggressions”.

He has now given Iran a free path to obtaining nuclear weapons, which they will use. If you doubt me then consider that Iran is the worlds largest state sponsor of terror, pays parents of homicide bombers a monthly stipend and during the Iran/Iraq war drugged thousands of Iranian teenagers and sent them into minefields with promises of heaven if they died. Iran is even worse than this but I don’t have the space to continue the list. Understand this, the leaders of Iran have no compunction regarding the death of millions. The current ruler of Iran believes it is his religious duty to begin the apocalypse that islamic teachings say is needed for islam to dominate the world.

He has, with the help of fellow haters like Eric Holder, Sharpton, Jackson, S.P.L.C. and La Raza (The Race), set race relations in America back nearly fifty years. He has cleverly and with much help from a compliant media set white against black/hispanic etc. He pits rich vs poor, Christian vs muslim, gay vs straight, employed vs unemployed and old vs young. He has, through his minions even brought back the divide of the Civil War. As a dedicated muslim there is no wedge he will not employ. To his followers, loyal liberal/progressives, there are no “offenses” they will not be offended by. If he really was Abraham Lincoln as some of his followers want the rest of us to believe he would remember that a “house divided” cannot stand.

He has promoted through his actions in cases like the thugs Martin and Brown, and in cases of police officers being openly assassinated, by his silence, an open war on law enforcement. Many misguided people have responded to his tacit acceptance and I fear many more will do so. Then there is Calypso Louie, leader of the Nation of islam calling for 10,000 blacks to rise up and kill white people. The Kenyan remains silent because Louie, having cleared his call with the mothership, is a really useful idiot.

He has nearly completed the destruction of the greatest economy the world has ever known. He hides the destruction through a combination of compliant media, hideous economic under education of students everywhere and dramatically manipulated unemployment/GDP numbers. He taxes profitable businesses out of existence, stymies new growth with unimaginable regulations, uses the U.S. treasury to pay off his supporters in unprecedented fashion and failing everything else, sues on every kind of made up “offense” imaginable. He pushes for unsupportable amounts of welfare (including housing, healthcare and education) to be given to anyone who can sneak across the border then used the understandably natural complaints about this largesse as another racial wedge.

He has gutted the top leadership levels (some estimates are now over 200 non-compliant Generals, Admirals, Colonels and Captains) of the military. He is now working on eliminating as much of our military capability as possible while advocating for a national police force under his control. He allows some 300,000 veterans to die waiting for treatment while allowing top VA administrators to collect millions of dollars in “bonuses.” He remains silent on demands for our soldiers to be prosecuted by the world kangaroo court for “war crimes.” He tried filling the ranks with known gang members so, presumably they could take their combat training back the streets to use against both citizens and law enforcement. He ruthlessly attacks Christians in uniform while deferring to militant islam at every turn. As for his much vaunted gays in the military charade understand this, he needed more than just your campaign contributions, he needed to know who you were. Homosexuals are just another unnecessary distraction to the military. But when the Kenyan finally gets his way he will have a rooftop waiting for all you little princesses and it will be the Kenyans supporters throwing you off. Wear your best panties for the funeral.

He has expanded the spying on Americans to levels that give murderous dictators around the world wet dreams. While the NSA spying programs are an evil of Bush’s creation, the Kenyan has expanded them to include everyone everywhere. Every phone call, every email, every website you visit and every purchase you make are now tracked, analyzed and stored forever in Utah. Just to let you know, your smart phone now tracks your every movement for the NSA as well. The Kenyan needs to know who his supporters are and spying is a great way to accomplish that. There is an even more important reason for the in depth level of intelligence gathering on the public though. The Kenyan and his minions need to identify and monitor their enemies. Despite the daily doses of propaganda dutifully rolled out by his mainstream media, he knows his enemies (politically speaking) are growing in numbers daily. Finally consider this. How much useful information could be gained against political opponents or judges by such a broad spectrum spying program? Can you say Mitch McConnel, John Boehner or how about John Roberts?

Finally, consider that he is importing tens of thousands of military age, muslim men into America as “refugees.” ISIS has publicly declared they will “infiltrate” the refugee population as a means of getting its wackjob followers that are too lazy to walk across our wide open southern border into America. The Kenyan knows this and allows it to happen while demonizing anyone like me who points out the folly of such an action as racist, mean spirited etc. Just as an aside, since when do refugees come equipped with the latest I-phones and selfie sticks?

America desperately needs a modern Venona project. I suspect the reason there is no current equivalent of the Venona project today is that all the leaders who could/would orchestrate such an endeavor have been forced out of the military/media/political processes. Those of us on the outside who attempt our own versions are demonized as intolerant rubes, racists, bigots, homophobes or worse, anti-American. Many of the same insults were hurled at critics of Roosevelt. It seems someone in Iran was paying very close attention to history indeed.

I sometimes wonder if the only remaining question left to answer is when do we hit the tipping point? At what point does the Kenyan declare America a part of the caliphate? He has already said we are no longer a Christian nation and told us how important the muslim contribution to the founding of America was. For the record muslims contributed nothing to Americas founding. Or, at what point does the Kenyan realize that enough American citizens have finally awakened to the threat of his massive deception? What is a terrorist dictator wannabe to do then? Does he have enough military and police force accomplices to take control of America? If he tries will anyone except us “right wing” and “bitter clingers” try to stop him? Will anyone even notice?

1 Comment

Filed under civil rights, taqyiyya

You Might Be A Liberal If…..


For nearly thirty years liberals have had near total control of the public education system. In that time they have been able to, with the help of a compliant media and sycophant politicians, create a false narrative about what it means to be a conservative and what it means to be a liberal. In an effort to help folks understand the difference between liberals/progressives and normal people I have created a list of possible warning signs that may occur prior to the onset of the dementia known as liberalism. Sometimes, in an effort to disguise their illness those afflicted with liberalism will diagnose themselves as progressives. Understand that this is merely an attempt by someone who knows they are afflicted trying to deny the affliction. Some of the following observations are funny, some are not and some are just plain sad. I take no credit for any of these symptoms (even the ones I think I came up with on my own) as I have doubtlessly recreated something someone said somewhere. That said, I am not a doctor and I don’t play one on TV so I don’t intend this to be a diagnostic tool but if you find yourself in sympathy with four or more of these statements I would suggest getting some professional, conservative education as soon as possible.

If you believe a black man robbing a liquor store is just expressing his civil rights, you might be a liberal. (Or belong to Black Lives Matter More Than Yours)

If you are so offended by religion that only a check can make you feel better, you might be a liberal. (Or have a degree in how to wear ascots at social functions)

If you think the best way to plan for parenthood is to kill your baby before it’s born, you might be a liberal. (Or a progressive female)

If you think the sailor in Chattanooga who fired his personal weapon at the jihadi terrorist trying to kill him should be court martialed, you might be a liberal. (Or a muslim/gun control whacko)

If your idea of a classic car is a 1997 Prius, you might be a liberal. (Or own stock in the electric company)

If you believe nuclear power in America is bad but nuclear power in Iran isn’t, you might be a liberal. (Or believe The China Syndrome was a documentary)

If you have a college vocabulary and a grade school mentality, you might be a liberal. (Or a tenured Ivy League professor)

If you spend your welfare check on pot, you might be a liberal. (Or California resident)

If you know what a Metro-sexual is, you may be a liberal. (If you have embraced your Metro-sexualism you may already be beyond help)

If you’re one of the three people who watch MSNBC, you might be a liberal. (Or someone not working three part time jobs thanks to O’bamacare)

If you’ve combed through your address book looking for a black/gay/transgender person to invite to your daughter’s wedding, you might be a liberal. (Or just desperately seeking politically correct approval)

If you know who Ed Shultz is, you might be a liberal. (And have far too much time on your hands)

If you know “what” Bruce Jenner is, you might be a liberal. (Or the afore mentioned Metro-sexual)

If you want to ban Christmas from the public square but demand prayer rooms for Muslims in public schools, you might be a liberal. (Or as the muslims call you, a useful idiot)

If you think Miley Cirus is normal, you might be a liberal. (Or a pervert)

If you think rap is music, you might be a liberal. (Or just deaf)

If you think Planned Parenthood has anything to do with planning for parenthood, you might be a liberal. (Or a frontal lobotomy survivor)

If Cecil the lion is more important to you than 50 million aborted children, you might be a liberal. (Or believe that animals have the right to vote, which come to think of it, may explain the last two presidential elections)

If you know all 52 genders, you may be a liberal. (Or a recent Ivy League College graduate)

If you think black lives matter but Planned Parenthood should be left alone, you might be a liberal. (Or closely related to Dr. Joseph Mengele)

If your idea of an intelligent protest is to walk around campus with a mattress tied to your back, you might be a liberal. (Or a “working” girl/guy doing some free advertising)

If you can’t wait to move to Seattle, you might be a liberal. (A note of caution here as the Seahawks are a pretty darn good NFL team and are likely to attract some perfectly normal people to the socialist workers paradise of Seattle.)

If you think the function of UNICEF is to feed starving children, you might be a liberal. (Or a just a well fed power hungry fellow bureaucrat)

If you cannot understand why Russell Wilson wants to wait until he is married to have sex with his girlfriend, you might be a liberal. (Or a voyeur)

If you’ve ever tried to pay for your global warming tattoo with an EBT card, you might be a liberal. (Or a resident of Colorado)

If you think 18 trillion dollars of debt is nothing to worry about, you might be a liberal. (Or an elected democratic)

If you feel the need to apologize for saying “All Lives Matter,” you may be a liberal. (Or feeling guilty for things that happened 160 years ago)

If you oppose charter schools for poor kids but send your own children to private schools, you may be a liberal. (Or a rich democrat)

If you support open borders but live in a gated community, you may be a liberal. (Or Bill Gates)

If you think Michael Moore actually makes documentaries, you might be a liberal. (Or a recent college graduate)

If your idea of tolerance is to “give people space” to riot, you might be a liberal. (Or a democrat city prosecutor)

If you can give directions without using your hands, you might be a liberal. (Or be dead)

If you support higher taxes but have directed your own trust fund to buy only tax-free municipal bonds, you might be a liberal. (Or a democratic party campaign contribution bundler)

If you believe that voter fraud is a myth, you might be a liberal. (Or a democratic party advisor)

If you went to an adoption agency and asked for a gay baby, you might be a liberal. (Or just plain stupid)

If you believe that police including a suspects race in their description is racist, you might be a liberal. (Or a newspaper editor)

If you believe the coldest, snowiest winter on record is caused by global warming, you might be a liberal. (Or have abandoned reason by memorizing Al Gores book)

If you believe that felons and illegal aliens should be allowed to vote but soldiers stationed overseas should have their votes ignored, you might be a liberal. (Or a card carrying lifetime member of the DNC)

If you believe in taking guns from law-abiding citizens but not inner city gang members, you might be a liberal. (Or a member of the ACLU)

If you believe the Clintons were broke when they left the White House, you might be a liberal. (Or be a part owner of the Brooklyn Bridge)

If you worship Mother Earth while “denying” other mainstream religions, you might be a liberal. (Or have ingested one to many “natural” substances)

If you think the United Nations does anything outside of enriching its bureaucrats, you might be a liberal. (Or a tin plated dictator wannabe)

If you support Obamacare for everyone else but are upset when you have give up your own health insurance plan, you might be a liberal. (Or a victim of the vast right wing conspiracy)

If you think having multiple affairs and sexual harassment allegations lodged against you are a resume enhancement, you might be a liberal. (Or Bill Clinton)

If you believe that George Stephanopoulos and Brian Williams are actually journalists, you might be a liberal. (Or just have a broken BS meter)

If you believe Elizabeth Warren is a Native American, you might be a liberal. (Or think “Fauxocahontas” is her real Indian name)

If you believe that operation Fast and Furious was left over from the Bush administration, you might be a liberal. (Or you may still be living in moms basement and think dial up is the latest technology)

If you’ve ever used the word meme in casual conversation, you might be a liberal. (Or in the advanced stages of terminal Liberalism)

If you hate smokers but cheerfully spend the money they pay in cigarette taxes, you might be a liberal. (Or just a whiny brat intent on proving you’re more compassionate with other peoples money than they are)

If you don’t know anyone with more than one child, you might be a liberal. (Or live in China)

If you think Barack Obama actually did something besides getting elected to deserve his Nobel Peace Prize, you might be a liberal. (A note of caution here, he did write two autobiographies before he actually accomplished anything aside from a senate election)

If you think about God as a her, you might be a liberal. (Or someone who has never read the Bible)

If you belong to a church that has to vote every year on which parts of the Bible to believe in, you might be a liberal. (Or you might be in the early stages of terminal multiculturalism)

If you have ever attended a candlelight vigil to protest the hoax of the week, you might be a liberal. (Or just don’t do well when reality asserts itself in your life)

If you think there is no such thing as muslim rape gangs, you might be a liberal. (Or a member of CAIR)

If you use the word undocumented as something other than a punch line for a joke, you might be a liberal. (Or a mainstream journalist)

If you still believe anything Ted Danson has ever said about “global warming”, you might be a liberal. (Or have watched one to many episodes of CSI)

If the only kind of gun you will tolerate is for caulking, you might be a liberal. (Or a professional victim)

If you don’t flinch at least just a little bit when a man introduces another man as his “husband,” you might be a liberal. (Or simply don’t know what a real man is)

If you know the name Frank Marshall Davis, you might be a liberal. (Or believe that Stalin was an agrarian reformer)

If you’ve ever watched an American war movie and rooted for the bad guys, you might be a liberal. (Or just plain stupid)

If you send your kid to a public high school that calls itself an “Academy,” you might be a liberal. (Or still in your seventh year of college)

If you have already scolded someone for calling Bruce Jenner “Bruce Jenner,” you might be a liberal. (Or an expert on political correctness)

If you have Michael Brown’s birthday circled in your planner, you might be a liberal. (Or a frequent contributor to the SPLC)

If your idea of expressing compassion after a tragedy is to call in Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton, you might be a liberal. (Or a race hustling poverty pimp)

If your kid has to wear a helmet to play on a jungle gym, you might be a liberal. (Or spend too much time on the Center for Science in the Public Interest website)

If you brag about your compost pile, you just might be a liberal. (Or have spent just a little too much quality time with your garbage)

If you live in an apartment and have a compost pile, you might be a liberal. (And you probably have no friends)

If you missed a family event to see the first midnight showing of “Selma,” you might be a liberal. (Or be related to Rachael Dolezal)

If you’ve ever thought or said out loud “I don’t mind paying taxes,” you might be a liberal. (Or on welfare)

If you insist on pronouncing Nicaragua with an accent, you might be a liberal. (Or a pompous twit)

If you use the f-word to describe love making, you might be a liberal. (Or a public school victim)

If you insist on calling yourself a progressive, you might a liberal. (Or just embarrassed by the stupidity of your liberal friends)

If you think people who protest embryonic stem-cell research are stupid but refuse to eat GMOs, you might be a liberal. (Or someone who knows that the “science” on GMO’s has been settled)

If you want to ban all guns except for those carried by your private security, you might be a liberal. (Or a loud, foul mouthed TV personality)

If you are against school vouchers for public school students but your kids go to a private school, you might be a liberal. (Or a Kenyan impersonating a US president)

If you “self identify” as a lesbian but secretly like men, you just might be a liberal. (Or a regular watcher of “The View”)

If you believe marriage is obsolete except for homosexuals, you might be a liberal. (Or the mayor of Houston)

If you think teenagers are not smart enough to handle sodas but you are willing to give them condoms and IUD’s, you might be a liberal. (Or a pedophile in recruiting mode)

If you deny women are stoned to death in islamic countries for having sex outside of marriage (being raped), you might be a liberal. (Or a muslim apologist/rapist/useful idiot)

If you think the death penalty is acceptable for an unborn child but not a mass murderer, you might be a liberal. (Or a fan of Charles Manson)

If you actually understand Common Core math, you might be a liberal. (Or mentally deranged)

If you think one of the worst violators of human rights in the world deserves to head the U.N. Human Rights Commission, you might be a liberal. (Or believe that being tortured is a human right)

If your idea of tolerance is giving “sanctuary” to illegal alien murderers, rapists and child molesters, you might be a liberal. (Or the Mayor of San Francisco)

If you think people who are terrified of something they (Atheists) don’t believe exists are rational, you might be a liberal. (Or have had a recent conversation with Charles Darwin)

Finally, if you actually believe banning the Confederate flag and removing Confederate monuments will achieve racial harmony, you may be to stupid to reason with.
I hate to say it but this list could go on for another several hundred pages. Liberals and progressives make it that easy. I think by now you, dear reader, are getting the idea of how liberals view the world. It is a uniquely odd way of life liberals have chosen. Today’s liberal/progressive views truth as a relative thing subject to nothing but their own intentions, definitions and feelings. Their idea of tolerance is beyond reason given the amount of time and money spent to “help” the poor and the levels of crime they are willing to tolerate to demonstrate their “compassion.” Their worship of a clearly perpetrated hoax (global warming, proven a hoax by their own emails) demonstrates beyond a doubt their derision of actual science. Despite all of this it is incumbent on us conservatives to remind liberals/progressives at every opportunity about the nature of their affliction. Liberalism is a self-feeding state of delusion that denies its victims the opportunity to live a fulfilling life of true meaning and accomplishment because it requires them to obtain the approval of those they have set as the arbiters of right and wrong. For far to many liberals/progressives happiness comes not from within but from approved outside sources. Some argue for a cautious, baby step approach to curing liberalism. I do not believe that approach can have any long lasting success. I prefer the tough love approach. Be bold, be patient, be accurate, be kind but most of all be relentless in your education of liberals. No matter what defense the liberal/progressive may attempt the truth is the conservatives ally. When engaged with a liberal/progressive remember this maxim, never give up, never surrender!

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Obama Just Proved He is A Radical Muslim

I am often criticized for my quite vocal belief that the Kenyan impersonating our president is a closet muslim. If I have said it once I have said it a million times, the Kenyan is a muslim deep in the practice of Taqiyya (the great deception allowed by the koran).

The so-called nuclear deal with Iran he “negotiated” serves to render all those criticisms invalid. Lets be perfectly blunt, there was no negotiation here. The Iranians got everything they demanded, when the Kenyan could give it to them with the least political damage to himself. He must , as his muslim handlers know, survive the political process to continue the destruction of the greatest nation the world has ever known. America it seems, couldn’t even get four hostages back in return for complete surrender.

Consider a couple of the “terms” of the agreement.

The fact that sanctions are being lifted means Iran will earn millions, perhaps billions, of dollars to begin to restore its failing economy and continue its sponsorship of terrorism around the world with renewed vigor. Iran and even the Kenyans administration have already admitted this.

The so-called inspections are weakened to the point of uselessness. The Iranians will get as much as 24 days advance notice of any “inspection” giving them more than enough time to be certain the inspectors only see what the government wants them to see. Parameters of the deal go as far as barring inspectors from the United States from participating in IAEA inspections. In other words we will often have to accept the word of those who wish us ill that Iran isn’t violating the agreement. Lovely.

As awful as these terms are there is one single fact that clinches beyond a doubt my contention that the Kenyan is a muslim. That fact is that the United States has obligated itself not only to help build the terror states nuclear program but to help Iran protect its nuclear research from attack.

Think about that for a minute. Why would a freedom loving country like America agree to fund the largest state sponsor (Iran) of terrorism in the world? Why would a peaceful country like the United States help build and protect a nuclear bomb building complex for a country that has sworn to kill anyone, including us and our allies, who will not submit to their control? Why would a president turn over the security (the inspection process) of his country to un-elected, anti-American bureaucrats that more often than not, openly express their hate for his country? Can you say fundamental transformation?

In perfect harmony with the first tenet of islam, spread islam everywhere by any means, the Kenyan has done nothing less than make America an Iranian client state. He has given the enemy the knife and soon its cold, sharp edge will be pressed at the throat of America. It is only a matter of time until a mushroom cloud over Washing DC provides the decapitation of the “Great Satan” so loudly and frequently demanded by the cult of islam.

In the middle of one of his multi million dollar, taxpayer funded vacations, the Kenyan knows he has much work to left do. Seeing that virtually no one is now willing to stand in his way, the Kenyan smiles.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Donald, Immigration Reform and Hate Crimes

As a first generation American I have always followed immigration closely. My grandmother and mother came to America through the front door. They worked long and hard to gain their legal status and citizenship. This is as it should be. I do not take their efforts lightly.

The Donald, no stranger to controversy, has made some telling comments on illegal immigration recently. It is not surprising to hear all the usual liberal/progressive/ democratic drones whining about how evil the Donald now is. If you actually think about what he said and familiarize yourself with even the basic facts about illegal immigration, you cannot actually find fault in his comments. One wonders if Donald has decided to unwrap himself from all the touchy feely BS that passes for reason in liberal circles.

In the past it seems he has given some consideration to some form of immigration reform. While he has never called for outright amnesty, at least that I can find, he has sounded at little to soft for me when he repeated the democratic talking points about “jobs Americans will not do” and having to deal with the ones already here. If he has “evolved” in his immigration thinking don’t liberals tell us evolution is a good thing?

The recent killing in San Francisco and the discovery that the Kenyans lack of enforcement released the future killers of 128 Americans rather than deport them proves that Mexico is not sending us their best and brightest. The Kenyan, his henchman Holder and any lawyer that ever helped keep any of these scumbags in America all have blood on their hands and belong in prison. It is entirely appropriate that, since democrats/liberals/progressives will not, Donald remind us what the true cost of illegal immigration can be. The evil in that last sentence is that liberals/democrats/progressives know that Donald is, if anything, understating the problem. For them, it is imperative that the American public be kept in the dark. If for no other reason than liberals need the votes.

And yes, Mexico is sending people here. Racist groups like La Raza (The Race, and why does this title not offend liberals/progressives/democrats?) and the Mexican government instituted an “unofficial” policy years ago to reclaim much of America with an unstoppable wave of illegal immigration, anchor babies and natural population growth. It’s known in inner circles as Reconquest. There are reliable reports that La Raza and the Mexican government both print and distribute “guides” on where to cross the border, how to locate and surrender to ICE as well as the names and numbers of accomplice lawyers and support groups. Included in the guides, some even in the form of comic books for children and those who cannot read, are directions to sanctuary cities, how to get false id’s and apply for government aid programs.

Leaving nothing to chance, once here assimilation is profoundly discouraged. Illegal immigrants are encouraged to devoutly maintain their “native” culture. Simple minded liberals/progressives/democrats echo this with their demands for multiculturalism. The cost burdens of non-assimilation alone show the lunacy of such demands but lunacy is what drives liberals/progressives/democrats. In their sad attempt to show how much more they “care” about anything they will cheerfully spend us into oblivion.

For calling out the failure of liberal/progressive/democratic immigration policy Donald is now paying a price. Politically correct companies like Macy’s and NBC have unceremoniously dumped the Donald. Univision, the propaganda arm of the Mexican government, has severed relations with him as well. If reports about the contracts between Donald and Univision are correct it will likely cost them millions of dollars when Donald wins in court. Univision doesn’t care. As a propaganda agency their mission is dis-information. The Mexican government will make up the cash shortfall. As for Macy’s they have long been an anti-American company. Why anyone would shop there escapes me entirely. As for NBC I wasn’t aware they were even still on the air.

For daring to address the subject of illegal immigration the Donald is now the single largest purveyor of hate in America, according to the left. For these moral relativists truth is optional, malleable or oftentimes, irrelevant. Donald has committed the hate crime of proclaiming the emperor has no clothes. Never mind that he has probably employed more minorities than most liberals/progressives/democrats will ever meet in their unhappy (I have yet to meet a truly happy liberal/progressive/democrat) lifetimes. He is now officially a hater.

My mother and grandmother assimilated very well into their new country. This doesn’t mean they forgot their heritage or where they came from. As my grandmother proudly told anyone who asked about her accent, “I was born in Germany but I am an American now.’ Grandma went back to college at age 55 and earned a degree in journalism. She never demanded her instructors teach in her native German. I suspect she would have been profoundly offended if they had.

The real hate crime is that so many on the left, in order to feel good about themselves, are willing to sacrifice the rule of law, the well being of their country and lives of their fellow citizens.

The real hate crime in America today comes from liberals/progressives/democrats who know exactly what is best for you and dress up their desires to control you as compassion and understanding.

The real hate crime is that any immigrant who attempts my grandmothers path is derided by those same liberals/progressives/democrats for not being black/latino etc enough.

The real hate crime is that any immigrant who seeks the American dream today must do so in his native culture.

The real hate crime is that millions of Americans see their country, incorrectly, as the source of evil in the world.

The real hate crime is liberals/progressives/democrats are so willing to pit Americans against each other in every way they can think of. Black vs White, straight vs homosexual, rich vs poor, citizen vs illegal.

Perhaps the most hateful crime of all is the chosen ignorance of far to many people who call themselves Americans.

In 2014 alone illegal aliens released back into our communities were responsible for 80,000 criminal convictions. These are just the convictions. How many serious crimes were plea bargained away and how many were never resolved or even reported? Contemplate this for a minute. This means people like the mayor of San Francisco, the Kenyan and his supporters are just fine (as long as the illegals continue to vote democrat) with hundreds of murderers, sex offenders, kidnappers and thousands of drunk drivers running amuck in your community. How does this “tolerance” thing work again?

On this issue Donald is absolutely right, get over it.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Most Reviled Court In America And The Liberal Tolerance Tirade

Ever since the Kelo decision I have wondered just what the hell was wrong with the Supreme Court. In that travesty of justice it was declared legal for the government to steal, sorry, appropriate, your property and give it to another private entity on the basis that the new owner might provide some “public” good by, for example, increasing the tax base. The history of the actual Kelo development proves that theory false. Yet, the law remains and is many times abused.

In two days over three rulings this month the alleged justices have outdone themselves in the intellectual gymnastics department. It appears now that reason in the court has the life expectancy of a donut within 25 miles of Michael Moore.

In Obergefell v. Hodges justice Roberts (of whom I am no fan) wrote in his dissent
“The five Justices who compose today’s majority are entirely comfortable concluding that every State violated the Constitution for all of the 135 years between the Fourteenth Amendment’s ratification and Massachusetts’ permitting of same-sex marriages in 2003. They have discovered in the Fourteenth Amendment a ‘fundamental right’ overlooked by every person alive at the time of ratification, and almost everyone else in the time since. They see what lesser legal minds—minds like Thomas Cooley, John Marshall Harlan, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Learned Hand, Louis Brandeis, William Howard Taft, Benjamin Cardozo, Hugo Black, Felix Frankfurter, Robert Jackson, and Henry Friendly—could not. They are certain that the People ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to bestow on them the power to remove questions from the democratic process when that is called for by their ‘reasoned judgment.’ These Justices know that limiting marriage to one man and one woman is contrary to reason; they know that an institution as old as government itself, and accepted by every nation in history until 15 years ago, cannot possibly be supported by anything other than ignorance or bigotry. And they are willing to say that any citizen who does not agree with that, who adheres to what was, until 15 years ago, the unanimous judgment of all generations and all societies, stands against the Constitution.” This time he was exactly right.

In a side note two of the liberal judges that chose to impose gay marriage on America have spoken in defense of gay marriage and even performed gay marriage ceremonies. Ethical requirements demanded these two recuse themselves from the gay marriage case. Demonstrating their true liberal colors and devotion to situational ethics, they chose not to.

It only took a couple of days (they had to get the celebratory orgies out of the way first I’m sure) for the progressive whack jobs to start their “tolerance” tirades. Contemplate the alleged intelligent discourse from Jay Michaelson at the Daily Beast (a site best known for its minimal IQ requirements and slavish devotion to democratic talking points). This simulated intellectual exercise is both representative of liberal/progressive responses to the courts decision and filled with false premises so devoid of reason that it is difficult to know where to start when debunking it. In the interest of fairness I should point out one, he actually got he court citations correct and second, I will try to respond as simply as possible. I wouldn’t want to strain their apparently overtaxed intellectual capacities.

Michaelson begins with a question, “In controversial cases, is the role of jurist to inflame controversy, or quell it?”

The questions premise is false and the answer is neither. In its simplest terms the court is to be presented with a question. The court then applies the law as it is written, not as they would like it to be or as they think it should be, or as the polls suggest, to the question at hand within the bounds of the constitution. Controversy is to be dealt with by the people through their legislative representatives. You know like the 32 states that voted to codify what everyone has known for 6,000 years, that marriage is made up of a man and a women. For ideologues like Michaelson who view everything from the prism of liberal ideology and/or race, this is to much to ask for. He continues.

“In Loving v. Virginia, the 1967 case which found race-based marriage bands unconstitutional, Chief Justice Earl Warren built a 9-0 consensus—just as he’d done years earlier in Brown vs. Board of Education. He knew that a country divided by race ought to be united, if possible, by a Supreme Court mindful of fundamental values—even if the Court was, as the constitution requires, overturning the will of the majority.”

Michaelson either doesn’t know or doesn’t care (I suspect the latter) that most of the “racist” southern states at the time were, and had been governed for some time by democrats (ie people like himself). Again, the court is only to determine how to apply the law as written within the bounds of the constitution. He prefers to intimate that gay marriage is a civil right. It is clearly not. Still, he drones on.

“ The four dissents in the landmark case on same-sex marriage, Obergefell v. Hodges, one by each of the conservative justices on today’s Supreme Court, take a very different view. With invective and hyperbole, they pour fuel on the fire of the controversy over same-sex marriage. Rather than merely state their views and disagreements, they use heated language to accuse the five-person majority of imperialism, a “putsch,” and worse.”

Finally, we get to the overheated, allegedly intelligent criticism. How dare those pesky “conservatives” deign to disagree with his highness. Why I bet Michaelson even graduated from a prestigious school of journalism with a minor in how to change the world. What could some simple minded conservative teach him? Even worse, how dare a black conservative lecture him. The very nerve of justice Thomas. I’m guessing he was to distraught to remember that this same court, the same majority justices, in the DOMA case, stated that marriage was the domain of the state, not the federal government. Liberals have no use for precedent unless they want it. Still, he bloviates on.

“Thus, the unprecedented calls of elected officials for open revolt against the Supreme Court—a shocking display of treason—are now accompanied by calls from within the Court itself that Obergefell is illegitimate, and the Supreme Court itself no longer worthy of full respect.”

Apparently asking the court to stay within the bounds of the constitution or recognize a precedent set by the very same judges is a “shocking display of treason.” Michaelson clearly feels threatened by the dissenters micro aggressions of not thinking the same way he does and not caving instantly to his version of political correctness. After all, haven’t Boehner and McConnell shown the proper way for republicans to grovel? The four dissenting justices are correct in their belief that a court that cannot limit itself to its constitutionally defined borders is in fact illegitimate and not worthy of respect. Such a court, as we now seem to have, is merely an extension of whatever political party is in power.

I can summarize Michaelsons article this way. He obviously believes that five justices have the right, enumerated nowhere I might add, to assume in this case that, “They are certain that the People ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to bestow on them the power to remove questions from the democratic process when that is called for by their ‘reasoned judgment, (Justice Roberts). I can’t help but wonder if in Michaelson’s closed world, did the justices get the Citizens United ruling correct? Still anxious to inundate us with his superior intellect he warns direly.

“Why not just tell the Religious Right to buy pitchforks and blowtorches? Chief Justice Roberts’ ironic opinion is immoderate in alleging immoderacy, extreme in alleging extremism.

Justice Scalia came next. And he begins thus: “I join THE CHIEF JUSTICE’s opinion in full. I write separately to call attention to this Court’s threat to American democracy.”

It seems inevitable that rhetoric like this will stir the next Confederate flag-waving zealot to an act of, if not domestic terrorism, at least outrageous revolt. How could it be otherwise?”

Inevitable? I know Michaelson is drenched in liberal ideology to the point of breathlessness but even a casual perusal of history proves his prediction questionable at best. From simple minds come simple conclusions. Michaelson, if he would make the effort, would learn quickly that conservatives almost never commit “domestic terrorism” or acts of “outrageous revolt.” Well, except for microaggressing by not voting democrat. He is far to immersed in his ideology and democratic party talking points to know or even care that the kind of acts he bemoans are committed almost exclusively by liberals and liberal demagogues. His gratuitous insertion of the Confederate flag is also telling. Like all liberal lemmings he feels compelled to jump on the flag hate fest. He is clearly ignorant of the flags history and the history of the Civil War. It is true that some hateful people have adopted that flag as their symbol. That is just as corrupt as gays adopting the rainbow as their symbol for shoving their arms up someones rectum. And yes they actually do this.

Even so, Michaelson can take some comfort in the response of fellow “journalists.”

A Harrisburg, PA newspaper has announced that it intends to censor views about marriage it deems no better than racism, sexism, anti-Semitism.

John L. Micek, editorial page editor, former state capital reporter and ferocious defender of free speech (okay, I made up the last one), made an announcement after the Supreme Court forced gay marriage on the county. He wrote, “As a result of Friday’s ruling, PennLive/The Patriot-News will no longer accept, nor will it print, op-Eds and letters to the editor in opposition to same sex marriage.”

When called out on his decision to limit free speech he took to his Twitter account to confirm his displeasure with any who dared to disagree with him. Said Micek, “This is not hard: We would not print racist, sexist, or anti-Semitic letters. To that we add homophobic ones. Pretty simple.” Simple? What I’m sure he meant but couldn’t bring himself to say was simpleminded.

When his condescending remarks failed to cool the flames, Micek tried to walk his intolerance back just a bit, “Clarification: We will not foreclose discussion of the high court’s decision, but arguments that gay marriage is wrong/unnatural are out.”

Micek goes on to compare opposition to same-sex marriage to “hate speech.” Translation, only those who agree need appear. So it will go with much of the media.

Given the lefts devotion to hate it is a certainty that Christians like myself will be targeted for what can only be described as persecution. Their hate fest has been going on piecemeal to date but now, hiding behind the skirts of five liberal/progressive judges the militant homosexuals will begin targeting in earnest as soon as the next orgy is over.

The two most pressing questions for me now are, how did we get to this point and what should we do next.

Craige McMillan described the path to this point in a recent column, “Washington, D.C., is now an echo chamber filled with pompous people-pleasers and others with checkbooks at the ready who want to be pleased. With enough money in hand, voters become irrelevant because they can be manipulated once every few years.

There is no moral compass guiding our nation’s decisions. The result with these finger-in-the-air types is situational ethics, contradictory laws and enforcement, and ultimately chaos – which destroys the many for the benefit of the few. Therefore, sexual license now automatically entitles one to a marriage license – which states cannot deny. Children become chattel. And that most basic right – conscience – is to be denied the many in service of the DC cocktail circuit.”

As for what to do next? Former lesbian Janet Boynes offers the following, “We are living in times where our faith will be tested. These are times in which we will be ridiculed for our beliefs and perhaps even incarcerated for holding the word of God as our voice of truth. As someone who has walked away from homosexuality and now has a ministry that helps men and women who desire to come out of this lifestyle, I have the responsibility to stay grounded in what I know is true. But it doesn’t stop there; you, also have the responsibility to remain steadfast without caving in to the pressures of this world. … The Supreme Court cannot redefine what they didn’t create.” Amen sister.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Greatest Generation And The Dirt Road

Anyone who knows me knows I venerate (all you public school graduates will simply have to look up the meaning of the word) my grandparents. I especially venerate my grandfather. He was in many ways as much my father as my dad was. My dad served in the U.S Army his entire adult life. He died in a car accident with 24 years of service. A tour in Vietnam, numerous other assignments and a sincere devotion to drink kept him from a normal family life. My grandfather, may he rest in peace, willingly stepped into the role of substitute father. He was truly part of the greatest generation.

At the tender age of four he began tending crops with his parents, owners of a small farm in east Texas. When he was old enough he joined the Navy. Because of extreme seasickness he was transferred to the Army where he served in the field artillery. When the Army formed the Army Air Corp he got himself transferred into the predecessor of the U.S. Air Force. He went with the Army Air Corp when it became the Air Force and retired from the USAF with 23 years total service.

In my family grandpas world war two service (the first four years in the Pacific then transferred to Germany in Jan 1945 where he stayed through the Berlin airlift) was something talked about quietly when he was not around. In the innocence of youth I had always thought of WWII as some kind of job. Get up, shower, eat breakfast, go to war, have lunch, go back to war for awhile then go home. I had no idea what a war was. It wasn’t until we studied WWII in history that I learned the truth about the second world war. Then, in my innocence I pictured my grandpa, rifle in hand, charging at the enemy who turned tail and ran away in fear. After all, this was the man who chopped of the heads of the rattlesnakes that always seemed to be living under the riding lawnmower. It was my chore to mow the lawn and I cannot ever remember a time I didn’t have to call on grandpa first.

Later my curiosity finally got the better of me. I think I was twelve, I asked Paul (my grandpas name) what he did in the war. At first I thought he might not answer me. He finally told me he had been a crew chief. I had no idea what a crew chief was but since he was a chief I figured he had to be in charge of something. I probed some more. “Well,” he offered “it was my job to make sure my plane was fixed and ready to go when it was needed.” He smiled a little then added, “B-17, B-29, B-25, even some fighters, there was nothing I couldn’t fix.” His smile suddenly faded as he added, “Well, almost nothing I couldn’t fix.”

The almost nothing comment grabbed a hold of my curiosity and would not let go. “What was it you couldn’t fix, grandpa,” I asked full of childish naivete. I remember to this day the look of sadness that overtook his nearly always joyful demeanor. I didn’t understand it at the time but I think I do now. In that moment, he had gone back to those dark days. He was there, reliving something he had worked long and hard to forget. In the quietest voice I had ever heard him use he said only, “I could never clean up the blood.” He put his hand on my skinny little shoulder, looked at me for a minute and then went into his room. Unsure what had just transpired but knowing I had been dismissed I went into the living room and sat down. A few minutes later grandma came out and said it would be best if we didn’t ask grandpa anymore war questions. The look on her face made it more like a royal commandment. It was a request I would honor for the next 25 years.

Sitting on the couch, neck deep in my blessed youthful ignorance I was thinking of some poor guy getting cut on a piece of metal and bleeding a bit on the floor of the bomber. I could not square that image with my grandpas remark. After all, when I had crashed my bike and slid halfway down Red Wreck hill, losing most of the skin on my left side, it was grandpa that carried me into the bathroom and cleaned and dressed my wounds. I had bled a lot that day as he pulled out pebbles and blacktop from my open wounds and grandpa never flinched. It wasn’t until much later that I learned many wounded airmen were allowed to bleed out and die in order to save another plane with less fuel by allowing it to land first. A crew of thirteen men can leave a lot of blood on the floor.

When grandpa retired he got a job as a jet engine mechanic in Dallas. It was a great job that had the advantages of paying well enough for him to live out in his beloved country and being something that he loved to do. On the downside it was a ninety-mile commute, one way. Still, there was one co-worker who lived even farther out than grandpa. To minimize expenses he would drive to grandpas house and ride to work with grandpa. Grandpa would pick up two others on the way in to work. To make the whole thing work he would get up at three am. Unable to contemplate three am as a child (I hated getting up at six am for school) I once asked him how in the world he could get up so early. “Whether I like to get up so early or not is not important,” he said, “it needs to be done so I do it.” Classic grandpa.

The man who taught me how to drive at age twelve (much to grandmas frustration) also mislead me on how to buy a car. As grandpa nearly always worked six days a week and sometimes seven days a week he put a lot of miles on his cars. Every year he would buy a new car. He took me with him once. We drove to the Chevrolet dealer in the small town ten miles down the road. As grandpa pulled into the parking lot a man came out to greet him. “Hello Paul,” he said as grandpa handed him the keys to his car. “Time for a new car?” Grandpa said yes and the man told him to look around, when he found what he wanted, just let him know. A few minutes later grandpa settled on a four door Impla. We went inside and the man gave him the keys to the new car, said the paperwork would be ready tomorrow and asked if that would be okay. Grandpa said yes and we drove off in a shiny new car. For longer than I will admit to that is how I thought people bought cars.

Whether it was making sure I had fed the cows before school or done my homework grandpa was always there. A lifelong practitioner of self-reliance, every moment was a teachable moment. If something broke you fixed it. If you couldn’t fix it then you hired the best man for the job and paid him a fair price. One of the things he excelled at was patience. He often took me and my brothers swimming at the local lake. Once he gave me four quarters for the juke box. At three songs per quarter I picked Bostons “More Than A Feeling” 12 times. Thinking he might not appreciate that I only chose the one song I asked him if he was okay with that. Smiling at me he asked, “Is it the best song in there?” I piped up right away, it was (and still is) the best song ever. “Then you did good.” I felt like a million bucks right then. The fact is grandpa was a big band fan. I suspect the music blaring across the lake that day meant nothing to him and was probably quite annoying but you would have never known it by looking at him.

I remember him making me come inside from playing on the day of the Apollo moon landing. We watched it on a 13 inch black and white tv set. He was so proud of what America had just accomplished. I remember sitting with him on Sundays and watching grandpas “Cowboys” play football. While I don’t know if he ever played football he would explain the game to me. I played in high school and Tom Landry is still one of my heroes.

The first time I heard the song I knew Grandpa had journeyed through his life on Sawyer Browns famous “Dirt Road.” He taught us to respect our elders, study diligently (not hard, there is a difference), stay out of trouble, work hard when required, work smart always and do it right the first time. While he never went to church he had a vast knowledge of scripture and would sometimes quote a passage or bible story to illustrate a point. He taught me to never confuse what is easy with what was right. One of the most valuable lessons I learned from him was that some things are wrong simply because they are wrong. He helped me develop my love of history, reading, football (I am still a Cowboys fan) and coffee. Although he managed to make and save a lot of money he never became enamored of it. Instead of living the high life he preferred to go fishing with us kids, sit in his easy chair with a good book, go for walks on the country road he lived on (our nearest neighbor was a quarter of a mile away) or have a cup of coffee on the porch in the morning and feed/watch the birds.

As I look back on my fifty some years I realize there is a lot of him in me. I too have spent my life on that dirt road and that is fine with me. Despite my best efforts with my kids and grandkids I can’t help but feel like a pale imitation of my grandpa. Todays silicon valley addled, five second attention span, politically correct indoctrinated young people have no idea what they have lost or how far they have fallen. The humble, character building dirt road has been replaced by the slickly marketed electronic superhighway of instant gratification, electronic anonymity and basement dwelling zombieism. I find that to be truly tragic and, more than anything, I miss my grandpa.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Cult Of Islam

I recently came across an article that confirmed a long held suspicion of mine. The article titled Characteristics Associated with Cultic Groups – Revised, by Janja Lalich, Ph.D. & Michael D. Langone, Ph.D. is revealing to those willing to see islam as it really is, a death worshipping cult. What a minute I hear you saying, what do you mean as it really is? Islam is a religion of peace, the Kenyan has deemed it so, so what could be wrong there? Ah Grasshopper, again the pebble eludes you.

I have made some studies of islam. I do not claim expert status but expert status is not needed to understand what the practitioners of islam are saying. It certainly does not require expert status to understand islams predilection for persecution and murder. After reading the islamic holy book which I will not give the dignity of a name, it is clear that hate and persecution are the stock in trade of islam. Strip away all the “thees and thous” from islam and you are left with a combination street gang/cult.

Lalich and Langone state that they consider the patterns listed in their paper as analytical tools rather than diagnostic tools. I think these patterns diagnose cults quite well. They add that, “many members, former members, and supporters of cults are not fully aware of the extent to which members may have been manipulated, exploited, even abused.” That describes nearly every defender of islam I have ever heard. I except from that last sentence the many alleged muslim “leadership” and “rights” groups, they know about the manipulation, torture, rape and murder but pretty much don’t care.

So, lets compare the patterns listed by Lalich and Langone to islam.

The first pattern listed says, “The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader and (whether he is alive or dead) regards his belief system, ideology, and practices as the Truth, as law.” Is there any doubt that this is a foundation of islam? Is not the killing of those who draw cartoons excessively zealous? How about murdering rape victims for having sex outside of marriage? Is that unquestioning commitment?

The second pattern listed says, “Questioning, doubt, and dissent are discouraged or even punished.” Change the should be punished to must be punished and you have islamic law. This brings to mind the story of the islamist mother who killed her seven year old son because he didn’t progress in his islamic studies as fast as she wanted him to. Islam does not allow dissent in any form, ever.

The third pattern listed says, “Mind-altering practices (such as meditation, chanting, speaking in tongues, denunciation sessions, and debilitating work routines) are used in excess and serve to suppress doubts about the group and its leader(s).” Sitting in quiet contemplation (meditation) is not a function of islam. The islamic school focuses virtually no attention on what we in the west would consider education. You don’t need to know how to read or write to detonate a bomb vest. The Madrasa’s function is to initiate its students into the world of hate and violence. Chanting and denunciation sessions they have down to a science.

The fourth pattern listed says, “The leadership dictates, sometimes in great detail, how members should think, act, and feel (for example, members must get permission to date, change jobs, marry—or leaders prescribe what types of clothes to wear, where to live, whether or not to have children, how to discipline children, and so forth).” Really? Do I have to explain this one? Can you say, burkas, dietary restrictions, muslim only zones, rules on how to beat your wife. All this evil and more is known as Sharia law.

The fifth pattern listed says, “The group is elitist, claiming a special, exalted status for itself, its leader(s) and members (for example, the leader is considered the Messiah, a special being, an avatar—or the group and/or the leader is on a special mission to save humanity).” Allah and his henchman Mohammed are so exalted that their authority is not allowed to be questioned, ever. The devout muslim has a religious duty to spread islam at any cost and by any means. Can you say Caliphate?

The sixth pattern says, “The group has a polarized us-versus-them mentality, which may cause conflict with the wider society.” I will let the islamist respond to this one, “Kill all the Jews and non-believers.” What other “mainstream” religion do you know that teaches their children how to kill people?

The seventh pattern listed says, “The leader is not accountable to any authorities (unlike, for example, teachers, military commanders or ministers, priests, monks, and rabbis of mainstream religious denominations).” When is the last time you heard about a mullah, imam or jihadi being prosecuted under islamic law for theft, assault, child abuse, rape, torture or murder? I thought not. In fact, under islamic law doing any of these things in the furtherance of islam is deemed praiseworthy. Can anyone remember the rape gangs that operated unopposed in England for fourteen years? (And don’t talk to me about the one or two people who may end up in jail over this. Thousands of muslims and their British enablers in the government will go scott free. The victims may never recover.)

The eighth pattern listed says, “The group teaches or implies that its supposedly exalted ends justify whatever means it deems necessary. This may result in members’ participating in behaviors or activities they would have considered reprehensible or unethical before joining the group (for example, lying to family or friends, or collecting money for bogus charities).” Can you say Taqiyya? For those do not know, Taqiyya is the islamic approved doctrine/process that allows a muslim to lie, cheat, steal and even deny his faith in his effort to infiltrate a group/country and further the spread of islam. The Kenyan little Barry is Americas foremost practitioner of Taqiyya.

The ninth pattern listed says, “The leadership induces feelings of shame and/or guilt in order to influence and/or control members. Often, this is done through peer pressure and subtle forms of persuasion.” Can you say honor killings? How about the death sentence for apostasy? Are you a homosexual, death is the only option under islam. What about chopping off the hands of a thief? Rape is a preferred method of intimidation and control. Islam is not a cult of subtlety.

The tenth pattern listed says, “Subservience to the leader or group requires members to cut ties with family and friends, and radically alter the personal goals and activities they had before joining the group.” The foundational tenant of islam is not that the individual should perfect himself and help his family to do the same so that they can be together in the afterlife, it is that the believer must advance islam by any means necessary. This includes sacrificing himself and his family should the opportunity present it self.

The eleventh pattern listed says, “The group is preoccupied with bringing in new members.” The islamists tell you straight up, everyone must convert to islam. For those who refuse to convert islamic law provides only two options, slavery or death.

The twelfth pattern listed says, “The group is preoccupied with making money.” This is the best disguised tenant of islam. No imam or ayatollah would subject himself to the poverty he forces those under him to endure.

The thirteenth pattern listed says, “Members are expected to devote inordinate amounts of time to the group and group-related activities.” Islam doesn’t require an inordinate amount of time, it demands all of your time.

The fourteenth pattern listed says, “Members are encouraged or required to live and/or socialize only with other group members.” This basic tenant of islam is making a gruesome comeback. Islamists are torturing, raping and killing tens of thousands of men, women and children for no other reason than these poor souls are not muslim. This also applies to things. The muslims are destroying thousands of years of history because it is not muslim history.

The fifteenth pattern listed says, “The most loyal members (the “true believers”) feel there can be no life outside the context of the group. They believe there is no other way to be, and often fear reprisals to themselves or others if they leave (or even consider leaving) the group.” This reminds me of the story I read not to long ago about a palistinian child who had received medical treatment in an Israeli hospital. The mother of the child said in an interview that she was glad her child had been saved and could not wait for the day when her child would strap on a bomb and kill Jews. She considers herself to be a devout muslim. I consider her mentally ill.

Sadly, all these tenants of islam have been successfully imported into the USA under the guise of tolerance. Dearborn, MI is well on its way to becoming a mini Iran within our borders. Why anyone should tolerate such behavior and attitudes is beyond me. Only the twisted intellectual gymnastics of your average liberal could justify the tolerance of such abhorrent behavior. Then again, liberals like muslims, are a culture of death, but that’s another article.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized